Gergen suggested that character, vision, and political capacity are three indispensable traits of anyone draw a bead oning to a leading place.A The seven virtuousnesss from Barker and Coy ‘s ( 2003 ) survey are humbleness ; bravery ; unity ; humour ; passion ; compassion ; and wisdom.Kirkpatrick and Locke ( 1991 ) pointed out that leading trait consists of six elements: thrust ; desire to take ; honestness and unity ; assurance ; cognitive ability ; and cognition of the concern.The indicants of transformational leading manner from leaders ‘ self-ratings are comprehending, extroversion and intuition while subsidiaries indicated that the most transformational leaders were feeling leadersBass ( 1985 ) , Tichy and Devanna ( 1990 ) and Ross and Offerman ( 1997 ) pointed out that creativeness, freshness, innovativeness, proneness to hazard, brave, believing in people, value-driven, life-long scholars, pragmatism, nurturance, feminine properties and assurance are the personality features regarded of transformational leaders.Most of these qualities can be connected with intuition, feeling and perceiving penchants harmonizing to theory of the MBTI ( Myers Briggs Type Indicator ) .
A Church and Waclawski ( 1998 ) added besides that extravert, intuitive, believing and comprehending are more transformational than their opposite numbers. This was supported by Roush ‘s ( 1992 ) survey of subsidiaries ‘ assessments that feeling, perceiving, intuition, and extraversion penchants received the most positive transformational evaluations. Intuitive and comprehending penchants were more likely to bespeak a transformational leading manner ( Van Eron and Burke, 1992 ) . While Roush and Atwater ( 1992 ) found feeling and experiencing penchants were strongly associated with transformational leading harmonizing to subsidiaries ‘ evaluations.Another group of bookmans examined the relationship between leaders ‘ personality with the Five Factors Model. Judge et Al. ( 2002 ) , and Bono and Judge ( 2004 ) revealed that extraversion has strongest correlativity with transformational leading. The survey by Judge and Bono ( 2000 ) asserted that extraversion and amenity were correlated with transformational leading.
In add-on, Ployhart et Al. ( 2001 ) showed that openness and extraversion were prognostic of maximal transformational leading public presentation.In this survey, the personal features of undertaking directors were measured following the personal competences framework in the Project Manager Competency Development ( PMCD ) Framework developed by the PMI ( 2002 ) . This standard identifies the personal features of effectual undertaking directors irrespective of the nature, type, size, or complexness of undertakings they may be engaged in pull offing. This theoretical account was adopted because PMI stuffs are being used in many statesThe undermentioned treatments on personal competences are extracted from PMI ( 2002 ) .
As stated by Boyatzis ( 1982 ) , competency agencies different things to different people. However, it is by and large accepted as embracing cognition, accomplishments, attitudes and behaviors that are causally related to superior occupation public presentation. This apprehension of competency has been described as attribute-based illation of competency ( Heywood, Gonczi et al. , 1992 ) .
Alternatively, performance-based attack to competence can be inferred from demonstrated public presentation at pre-defined acceptable criterions in the workplace ( Gonczi, Hager et al. , 1993 ) .The PMI ‘s definition of “ competence ” adopted from Parry ‘s ( 1998 ) work is “ a bunch of related cognition, attitudes, accomplishments, and other personal features that affects a major portion of one ‘s occupation, correlates with public presentation on the occupation, can be measured against well-accepted criterions, can be improved via preparation and development and can be broken down into dimensions of competences ” . The major constituents of competences include: abilities, attitudes, behavior, cognition, personality and accomplishments.The PMI ‘s definition of “ personal competence ” adopted from Finn ( 1993 ) and Crawford ( 1997 ) is “ the nucleus personality features underlying a individual ‘s capableness to make a undertaking. These are behaviors, motivations, traits, attitudes, and self concepts that enable a individual to successfully pull off a undertaking ” .The personal competences from PMI presented here are those considered to outdo represent the personal features required of a competent undertaking director in any type of undertaking. They were derived from the Competency Dictionary ( Spencer Model ) developed by Lyle and Signe Spencer ( 1993 ) and adapted to suit the proficient demand of the PMCD model.
The six competency units are:aˆ? Achievement and action: This competence consists of achievement orientation ; concern for order in quality and truth ; inaugural and information seeking.aˆ? Helping and human service: This competence implies that the director has client service orientation and interpersonal apprehension.oˆ‚?A Impact and influence: This competence comprises impact and influence capableness ; administration consciousness and relationship edifice.aˆ? Managerial competence: This competence includes teamwork and co-op ; capableness in developing others ; team leading and directivity, assertiveness and positional power utilizing.aˆ? Cognitive: This competence implies that the director has both analytical thought capableness and conceptual thought ability.aˆ? Personal effectivity: This competence covers self-control ; assurance ; flexibleness and organizational committedness.
who encourages subsidiaries to set in excess attempt and to travel beyond what they ( subsidiaries ) expected earlier. The subsidiaries of transformational leaders feel trust, admire, loyal and regard towards leaders and are motivated to execute extra-role behaviors ( Bass, 1985 ; Katz and Kahn, 1978 ; Bass and Avolio, 1993 ; Conger et al. , 2000 ) . Howell and Frost ( 1989 ) , Clover ( 1990 ) , Deluga ( 1992 ) , Kirkpatrick and Locke ( 1996 ) , Barling et Al. ( 1996 ) asserted that transformational leading manners affect higher undertaking public presentation. While Hater and Bass ( 1998 ) , Howell and Frost ( 1989 ) and Conger et Al. ( 2000 ) claimed that transformational leading behaviors are associated with subsidiaries ‘ satisfaction.
Transformational leaders achieve the greatest public presentation from subsidiaries since they are able to animate their subsidiaries to raise their capablenesss towards success and develop subsidiaries ‘ advanced problem- work outing accomplishments ( Bass, 1985 ; Yammarino and Bass, 1990 ) . Jung et Al. ( 2003 ) found important relationships between this manner and innovative-supporting organizational clime. Furthermore, Shin and Zhou ( 2003 ) besides reported positive relationship with followings ‘ degree of creativeness.
This paper set out to analyze the influence of undertaking directors ‘ personal competences and leading behaviors on subsidiaries ‘ work public presentation and leading results utilizing informations from 52 building undertakings in Thailand. The results sing undertaking directors ‘ personal competences show that Thai undertaking directors have cognitive competence higher than other competences tested in this survey. Correlation analysis consequence clarified that undertaking directors with high assisting and human service competence and/or personal effectivitycompetence are likely to bring forth high work quality, work measure and job work outing creativeness from their subsidiaries whereas those with high cognitive competence supported subsidiaries to bring forth high work measure and job work outing creativeness while those with high accomplishment and action competence are likely to deduce better work quality from the subsidiaries.
The association between PMCD personal competences ( accomplishment and action, assisting and human service, impact and influence, managerial, cognitive and personal effectivity ) developed by PMI ( 2002 ) and MLQ leading behaviors developed by BassA and Avolio ‘s ( 2004 ) reveals that the full personal competences have important positive relationship with every factor in the transformational manner but they have important positive relationship with lone contingent wages factor in transactional manner whereas they all have negative relationship withA laissez-faireA manner. It implies that undertaking directors who apply transformational leading behaviors with their subsidiaries are assumed to hold the indispensable personal features required of a competent undertaking director defined by PMI every bit good.The consequences farther indicate that all personal competences units have important positive relationship with leading results ( effectivity, satisfaction and excess attempt ) . A possible account for this is a undertaking director with high PMCD personal competences is likely to bring forth effectivity from his/her leading, by accomplishing organizational aims, ends and helping his/her subsidiaries to success in their work life, more than one with less. In add-on, the stronger the PMCD personal competences a undertaking director has the more his/her ability to do the subsidiaries satisfied and to actuate them to set excess attempt into their work. Among all the PMCD personal competences, personal effectivity competence has the highest relationship with all leading outcome facets.
It implies that a undertaking director with high self-denial, assurance, flexibleness and organizational committedness is likely to bring forth higher work effectiveness while at the same clip bring forthing subsidiaries ‘ satisfaction and back uping them to set great attempt into their work than those with high degree in other competences.Another determination of this survey is that the leading manner largely adopted and turn outing to be most suited for Thai people is the transformational leading manner. Consequences clearly indicate that transformational leading manner creates leading results ( effectivity, satisfaction and excess attempt ) from subsidiary more than transactional andA laissez-faireA leading manner. This determination agrees with Katz and Kahn ( 1978 ) , Bass ( 1985 ) , Hater and Bass ( 1988 ) , Howell and Frost ( 1989 ) , Bass and Avolio ( 1993 ) and Conger et Al.
( 2000 ) . It implies that a undertaking director who adopts the transformational leading manner is supposed to bring forth effectivity from his/her leading, by accomplishing organizational marks, ends and support his/her subordinates to carry through the demands in their occupation more than a undertaking director who adopts the transactional leading manner or theA laissez-faireA manner. Transformational leading manner besides yields higher satisfaction from subsidiaries and spur them to exercise more attempt to work than the transactional leading manner in building undertakings in Thailand.Sing the influence of leading behaviors on subsidiaries ‘ work public presentation, a undertaking director who adopts the transformational leading attack can back up subsidiaries to bring forth better work quality and work measure. This agrees with Howell and Frost ( 1989 ) , Clover ( 1990 ) , Deluga ( 1992 ) , Kirkpatrick and Locke ( 1996 ) , Barling et Al. ( 1996 ) and Sosik et Al.
( 1997 ) . In add-on, subordinates tend to hold high creativeness in job resolution when working with transformational leaders. This determination supports both the survey by Jung et Al. ( 2003 ) , and Shin and Zhou ( 2003 ) .
This survey focused chiefly on the consequence of undertaking directors ‘ personal competences and their leading manner on subsidiaries ‘ work public presentation and leading results. Another issue of concern here is the relationship between undertaking directors ‘ personal competences and their leading behavior. It was intended to place the most appropriate leading manner and the needed personality, property and accomplishments of the proficient undertaking directors in the building industry.
In drumhead, a undertaking director with high PMCD personal competences tend to bring forth leading results ( effectivity, satisfaction, excess attempt ) more than one who has less while a undertaking director with highpersonal effectivity competence is likely to bring forth higher degrees in all leading results than those with high degree in other competences.Transformational leading manner is the major leading manner in Thai building undertakings. Consequences besides clarified that this leading manner is likely to bring forth higher leading results than the transactional manner and theA laissez-fairestyle. Transformational leading manner tends to bring forth high work quality, work measure, and job work outing creativeness from subsidiaries. Besides, leaders who apply transformational behaviors are likely to hold the critical undertaking director personal features as defined by the PMI besides.
Practical IMPLICATIONS AND FUTURE DIRECTIONS
The survey adds some extra cognition in the appropriate leading manner and effectual personal competences of building undertaking director for the eastern context in the 21stA century. The consequences clarified that undertaking directors who apply transformational leading manner every bit good as those with high PMCD personal competences are likely to bring forth greater leading results and work public presentation from their subsidiaries in building undertakings.
It implies that, project managersA can set their leading behaviors in practical ways and develop their ain personal competences to suit with subsidiaries ‘ penchants and back up them to bring forth high work public presentation every bit good as enhance leading results. In add-on, the human resource direction map in the building companies can use these consequences for their leading development attempt.Emerging from this survey is the demand for farther surveies in several waies. First, this survey used Bass and Avolio ‘s ( 2004 ) MLQ to mensurate leading behavior of undertaking directors whereas personal competences were measured following PMCD developed by the PMI ( 2002 ) . It would be interesting to utilize other instruments to mensurate leader behavior and personal competences or to use several instruments at the same clip and compare the consequences. Second, this paper examined the current leading behavior and its effects on people working in the Thai building industry.
It would inform the research community to garner informations from other industries which have different nature of work in order to find if there is a tantrum between leading manner and nature of work or personality and nature of work. Third, there are other possible accounts for the consequence in this survey. It is possible that the leading manners adopted at the professional to professional degree is different from those adopted at the professional to technician or worker degree. That is, directors may follow transformational leading when covering with other professionals but may take to follow transactional leading when taking technicians or site workers. A survey clear uping this would look to be appropriate.