Human behavior in Organization and Leadership style used in running a certain organization is important in achieving administrative goals.
An outcome of a certain degree of effort rendered by an employee may sometimes result to indefinite outcomes which are not consciously intended. One of the alarming reasons for this piece of thought is the level of incentive being given to a worker in exchange for the services provided by a subordinate as commanded by the head. An individual’s height of commitment to the kind of work being rendered has a tendency of leading to an aggressive behavior which leads to an unhealthy result of oligopolistic competition.A common observation on conflicts in an organization is the possibility to compete with workers of the same rank by having the head of an organization catch their attention which will then lead on to an upgrade on the level of amazement.
Eventually, it will then be taken to assumption that there is a huge possibility for the two individuals to dive in a closer relationship as social science may clearly define it. That certain level of connection shall then pilot to administrative matters giving the one closest to the heart a favored sense of promotion which will distort the other in a subliminal way. However, not all that is designed, implemented and emitted by the use of the reward system gives a positive impact on the worker’s performance.
One must keep in mind that everything that is too much does not make any good. In some cases, it results a person be greedy and craving for more which then blinds their sense of morality and the selfish deeds are most likely to surface.The role of workers in an organization is to give their best out of their skill or intellect for them to gain the right amount of compensation equal to their capacity and capability. But research cases have shown that the contemporary society in the modern world has now jumped in a more strategic sense of clever service, which already includes hypocrisy and shallow pride. According to Steven Kerr, an organizational theory analyst, there are eight existing fields often dwelled on by the modern society namely; politics, war, medicine, universities, consultation, sports, government and the complicated world of business.
All of which by stand create managerial obstacles and a cycling haphazard on understanding why the organization’s strategy of motivating is only trying to worsen the serene attitude of workers towards their kind, folly it is.Each organization must possess a distinguished kind of technique in administering for it to fully be able to exercise their power and responsibilities as per stated in their charter and designed in their conceptual framework. Along with those requirements for organizational stability is the ability to motivate their constituents to strive harder in achieving the goals of the organization by implementing a series of rules and incentive regulations for motivational purposes. Additionally, an effective leadership style will network itself to that aim.Service bargains are implemented for the purpose of employee satisfaction. It is a well-versed common organizational technique to keep the company’s employees under their umbrella instead of losing them for a reason of searching for greener pastures.
Take for example, one of the major activities done by a Human Resource Manager is to send out evaluation forms to its workers (either annually or quarterly) embroidering a set of questions on how they find their work and the administration’s performance in attending to their needs. For some, they include the workplace’s ambience as well as the assessment on the benefits that they receive for the purpose of knowing their level of performance. An organization’s performance is evaluated through various types: survey, interview, keen observation by a committee or a resource person and the most effective, and the above-mentioned employee evaluation.Public administration deliberately stress that work plus reward is not enough.
Sensitivity is required in molding a more productive individual by giving concern on the essence of its constituents being human beings and not as pets being fed with whatever is available in the cupboard.