Irish social policy

Trajectory of Irish Family and Social Policy

1. Introduction

Trajectory of Irish household and societal policy reviews the development of policy, statute law and Irish authorities patterns to guarantee kid public assistance and general public assistance of the household. The Constitution is of import in any Irish societal policy because it contains a series of directing rules of societal policy. Of importance are the undermentioned articles:In Ireland the household is based on matrimony which has been the basis of household policy preparation and therefore societal policy was meant to heighten and protect the household based on matrimony. This essay focuses on the development of policy throughout the 20Thursdaycentury, the mileposts achieved, policy in the 21stcentury, mileposts yet to be achieved and the hereafter of household and societal policy in Ireland.

Best services for writing your paper according to Trustpilot

Premium Partner
From $18.00 per page
4,8 / 5
Writers Experience
Recommended Service
From $13.90 per page
4,6 / 5
Writers Experience
From $20.00 per page
4,5 / 5
Writers Experience
* All Partners were chosen among 50+ writing services by our Customer Satisfaction Team

2. Irish household policy in the twentieth century.

Irish societal policies were developed by the Catholic Church and the province.

The societal policy was foremost developed in 1944 and was really selective. In the 1970s, household support, as hard currency inducements, for single adult females and abandoned married womans was included. Policy by and large endorsed and supported full clip bread victor function for the male parents and housewife function for the adult females.

All available household services were offered by the church and voluntary sectors. [ Fahey, T. and Russell, H. ( 2001 ) ]The 1990s decennary saw major developments on the societal policy. In 1996 a committee on the household was set up to reexamine the household policy.

Their publication in 1998 brought a The first type involved consolidation of bing household policy. Lone parents and attentions of the aged were recognized as a legitimate sector of the society with public assistance demands.The 2nd type involved transmutation of household policy through a whole scope of step designed to accommodate household and work life in order to raise the degree of support for caretakers. [ Mary Daly and Sara Clavero ( 2002 ) ]

3. Milestones achieved on societal and household policy in Ireland in the 1990s decennary

There was a batch of development in societal policy in the 1990s decennary. This was basically brought about by the committee on household study.

The following were some of the accomplishments.There was development of services to back up households. Two type of household services were initiated are being developed. The first involves focal point on households in demand life in deprived countries. There was more accent on hard currency bailouts to back up kids as a conduit for back uping the household.Another milepost was in the rapprochement of work and household life. There were increased inducements for parents to take clip off work to care for their kids with accent being put on male parents.

The other milepost was in relation to childcare. There was enterprise for proviso of kid rights in the signifier of societal services which included instruction services and wellness services and engagement in determinations that affected them. [ Fahey, T. and Russell, H. ( 2001 ) ]There was increased focal point on rearing where parent duties were more emphatic with force per unit area being put on both parents for proviso of attention to the kid.

Non married twosomes were accorded similar revenue enhancement privileges and rights as married twosomes. [ Family Support Agency ( 2004 ) ]Until late there has been no expressed household policy in Ireland but assorted steps have been introduced that impact on households in a broad assortment of ways. The Commission on the Family study ( Commission on the Family 1998 ) recommended that household impact statements should be carried out on all policies, plans and services to find their impact on households.

  1. Family Policy and Social Inclusion

The Government has pursued a policy in recent old ages of to a great extent puting in Child Benefit in order to increase supports to households with kids. “This policy of bettering the cosmopolitan kid benefit has, nevertheless, left the targeted benefits for kids in low-income households more or less untasted in recent years” ( Daly and Clavero 2002:55 ) . However, the Government has made a committedness to guarantee that the combined value of child support is increased in line with the National Antipoverty Strategy.Changes in family-related revenue enhancement include the debut of the Home Carer’s Credit ( 2000-2001 ) .

The extension ( in September 2001 ) of the Back to Education Allowance to people aged between 18 and 20, acquiring an occupation searcher payment or lone parent payment for at least six months and who had been out of the instruction system for two old ages, was besides an of import development.One of the cardinal aims of the revised National Anti-Poverty Strategy (Constructing an Inclusive Society, 2002 ) was to cut down consistent poorness to below 2 per cent. The NAPS Action Plan against Poverty and Social Inclusion 2003-2005 drew attending to the ongoing demand to “provide where necessary supports for household life through employment, income support, kid and senior attention services, rearing and other household support services ( p.9 ) . [ National Anti-Poverty Strategy ( 2002 ) ]Family Policy: Role of Statutory Agencies

  1. Department of Social and Family Affairs

In add-on to household income care, the Department of Social and Family Affairs ( DSFA ) has a important function in developing household supports and services. The DSFA Strategy ( 2003 ) includes the undermentioned ends for households: back uping households in caring for kids and other dependent household members, guaranting specific supports for deprived households, households in struggle, one-parent households and households on low-income and working with other bureaus to place and develop responses to identify household issues. The Strategy set out the following aims in regard of households:

  • To lend to the development and execution of appropriate policies and actions to advance household public assistance by and large ;
  • To guarantee that the societal public assistance system responds efficaciously to the demands of different household state of affairss ;
  • To set in topographic point plans and supportive steps to assist households in struggle and to turn to the effects of separation and divorce on households ;
  • To work with other Departments and bureaus in presenting support to households ; to guarantee in so far as possible that people meet their duties to back up their household.

A series of actions was set out in regard of each of the above aims which included the development and publicity of high quality research, the development of locally-based household resource centres, turn toing the demands of low-income households, the proviso of matrimony and relationship guidance services and the publicity of household mediation in breakdown state of affairss.

  1. Family Support Agency

A important policy development was the constitution of theFamily Support Agencyin May 2003. The bureau operates under the auspices of the Department of Social and Family Affairs. Its mission, as stated in its first strategic program is “ to advance household and community good being through the proviso of appropriate supports and services to families” ( p. 7 ) . [ First Strategic Plan, Family Support Agency ( 2003 ) ]This Agency is a dedicated organic structure, with clearly defined maps in the country of household services and policy. Its map is to convey together pro-family plans and services introduced by the Government in recent old ages, which are designed to:

  • advance local household support
  • aid forestall matrimonial dislocation
  • promote continuity and stableness in household life
  • support ongoing rearing relationships.

Department of Health and ChildrenThe Department of Health and Children has a remit in household policy, which has traditionally been interpreted in the narrower sense of kid protection. However, the Health Strategy makes an expressed committedness that “ household support services will be expanded: It states that:

  1. Child public assistance budgets will be refocused to supply a more even balance between safeguarding activities and supportive plans ;
  2. Springboard Projects and other household support enterprises will be further developed ;
  3. Positive parenting supports and plans will be expanded ;
  4. Effective out-of-hours services will be developed in all wellness board countries as a precedence ;
  5. Family public assistance conferences and other services required to back up the Children Act, 2001 will be introduced ;
  6. Precedence will be given to early intercessions for kids with behavioural troubles.

  1. Department of Education and Science

The Department of Education and Science seeks to turn to educational disadvantage by advancing a figure of plans. For illustration, the Home School Community Liaison Scheme aims to construct a partnership between parents and instructors to foster the kid ‘s acquisition. The Early Start Program offers pre-school topographic points to 3-4 twelvemonth olds in deprived countries. The “Breaking the Cycle Program” on the other manus offers extra resources to designated schools.

  1. Childcare Policy

The dominant focal point in child care services since the early 1990s has been on the protection and attention of kids who are at hazard. More late, the policy focal point has shifted to a more preventive attack to child public assistance, affecting support to households and single kids and aimed at decreasing the demand for more substantial intercessions subsequently.

  1. Children Act 2001

The Children Act 2001 [ 1 ] is chiefly concerned with kids at hazard and kids who have committed offenses. The drift of the Act is to deviate immature people from detainment, guarantee greater parental duty and engagement and promote community-based multidisciplinary attacks.Three Departments have a function in implementing the Children Act: the Department of Justice, Equality and Law Reform, the Department of Health and Children and the Department of Education and Science. The National Children’s Office ( see below ) has duty for supervising and organizing the execution of the Act. The chief elements of the Act which are in force are:

  1. The Garda recreation plan ; a mulcts construction for kids found guilty of offenses and the payment of compensation by parents in regard of offenses committed by their kids ;
  2. Court orders to parents to exert proper control over their kids ; the debut of a curfew for kids found guilty of an offense ;
  3. The Children Court regulations on the intervention of kid suspects in Garda Stationss ( for illustration, they may non be in the company of grownup suspect and their parents must be contacted ) .

    1. National children’s scheme

Ireland’s foremost of all time National Children’s Strategy was launched in November 2000. The Strategy is a ten-year program to better the quality of all children’s lives and it includes a big figure of proposed actions across a broad scope of policy countries. It was seen as a major enterprise in come oning Ireland’s execution of the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child. ( National Children’s Strategy, 2000 )National Child Protection GuidelinesChild protection is an of import facet of the kid and household support continuum. The National Child Protection Guidelines( Children First ) ,introduced in 1999, represented a important milepost in the proviso and development of services. “ Children First ” provides a set of rules and good pattern guidelines which emphasize the importance of inter-agency co-operation and sketch the assorted stairss to be followed in order to protect kids at hazard and seek to forestall the return of kid maltreatment.

[ National Child Protection Guidelines, ( 1999 ) ] .

  1. National Children’s Office

The National Children’s Office was established in 2001 to promote the coordination of policy and service bringing for kids at national and local degrees. It oversees the execution of the National Children’s Strategy. It is involved with and proctors the work of authorities sections and bureaus covering with kids, particularly the Department of Education and Science, the Department of Social and Family Affairs and the Department of Justice, Equality and Law Reform.

  1. Childcare Facilities

The Equal Opportunities Childcare Programme, funded through the Department of Justice, Equality and Law Reform, was developed under Regional Operational Programmes of the National Development Plan, 2000-2006. It undertook a major enlargement of child care services for working parents.

  1. Family Carers

The Irish societal public assistance system contains three signifiers of fiscal support for household carers. The Carer’s Allowance was introduced in 1990 to replace the Prescribed Relative’s Allowance which was paid to some pensionaries who needed full-time attention and attending.

In its present signifier, the Carer’s Allowance is tightly means-tested and available merely where changeless and intensive attention is needed. TheCarer’s Leave Act, 2001allows employees to go forth their employment for up to 65 hebdomads to supply full-time attention. [ Garavan, R. , Winder, R.

and McGee, H. ( 2001 ) ]

  1. Work/Family Balance

The Government is committed to rapprochement of work and household life through back uping the proviso of child care installations, through bettering statutory entitlements to go forth and through non-statutory steps at the degree of the endeavor. Accommodating work and household life was an of import subject in the Irish EU Presidency Conference (Families, Change and Social Policy in Europe, 2004 )where rapprochement policies were defined as those that supported a parent or parents so that they have a existent pick in doing their work and attention determinations.

  1. Family Courts

A Law Reform Commission Report on Family Courts ( Law Reform Commission, 1996 ) pointed out that, despite a turning acknowledgment by society of the broad assortment of jobs associated with the dislocation of household relationships and the assorted betterments in household jurisprudence ( Annual Report 2003:64 ) and is proactively developing household jurisprudence installations as portion of its modernisation and renovation programme. This is an of import facet of the development of the household tribunal system which in the yesteryear provided merely really unequal installations.

5. Decision

The Irish household and societal policy has come a long manner from the 20Thursdaycentury to where it is now. However for the people of Ireland to bask them, they must be to the full implemented. Policies should besides be continually updated in order to take into history any new emerging tendencies in the household economic system, political relations and worldwide tendencies in societal policy.


  • European Court of Human Rights, ( 1994 ) quoted in Irish Times 27th May, 1994, Irish Times, Dublin.
  • The Law Reform Commission ( 1996 ) ,Family Courts,The Law Reform Commission, Dublin.

  • Government of Ireland ( 1996 ) ,Report of the Expert Working Group on the Integration of the Tax and Social Welfare Systems, The Stationery Office, Dublin.
  • Government of Ireland ( 1997 ) ,An Action Programme for the Millennium, Stationery Office, Dublin.
  • Yeates, N. ( 1997 ) , “Gender, Informal attention and Social public assistance: The Case of the carer’s Allowance” ,Administration, 45:2 21-43.
  • Department of Social, Community and Family Affairs ( 1998 )Reappraisal of the Carer’s Allowance, the Stationery Office, Dublin.
  • Heckman, J. J.( 1999 ) ,Policies to Foster Human Capital, Aaron Wildavsky Forum.

  • Department of Social, Community and Family Affairs ( 2000 ) ,Reappraisal of the One Parent Family Allowance,Department of Social, Community and Family Affairs, Dublin.
  • Fahey, T. and Russell, H. ( 2001 ) ,Family Formation in Ireland: Tendencies, Data Needs and Implications,Economic and Social Research Institute, Dublin.
  • Garavan, R. , Winder, R. and McGee, H. ( 2001 ) ,Health and Social Services for Older Peoples ( HeSSOP ) .

    Consulting Older Peoples on Health and Social Services: A Survey of Service Use, Experiences and Needs,National Council on Ageing and Older Peoples, Report No. 64, Dublin.

  • Department of Health and Children ( 2001 ) ,Quality and Fairness – A Health System for You, The Stationery Office, Dublin.
  • Joint Committee on Family, Community and Social Affairs ( 2001 ) ,The Challenges of Ageing, Care Giving and Political Choice, presented to the Oireachtas Committee on Family, Community and Social Affairs in July 2001.
  • Government of Ireland ( 2002 ) ,Report to the United Nations on the National Plan for Women.

  • Western Health Board ( 2002 ) ,Review of Adequacy of Childcare and Family Support Services,Western Health Board.
  • Mary Daly and Sara Clavero ( 2002) .Contemporary Family policy: A comparative reappraisal of Ireland, France, Germany and the UK, Dublin.
  • Dublin City Council ( 2002 ) ,Profile of Households Accommodated by Dublin City Council,Dublin.
  • Department of the Taoiseach, ( 2003 ) ,Prolonging Progress, Social Partnership Agreement 2003 – 2005, the Stationery Office, Dublin.
  • Timonen, V. ( 2003 ) ,Irish Social Expenditure in a Comparative International Context,Combat Poverty Agency, Dublin.

  • Treoir ( 2003 ) ,Work it Out,Treoir, Dublin.
  • Walls, M. ( 2003 ) ,Collaborative Law: A Better Way for Separating Couples,Family Lawyers Association Annual Conference, November 2003.
  • Whelan, C.T.

    , Layte, R. , Maitre, B. , Gannon, B.

    , Nolan, B. , Watson, D. and Williams, J. ( 2003 ) ,Monitoring Poverty Trends in Ireland: Consequences from the 2001 Living in Ireland Survey,Economic and Social Research Institute, Dublin.

  • European Commission ( 2003 ) ,Employment in Europe,European Commission, Brussels.
  • Family Support Agency ( 2004 ) ,Strategy Plan 2004-2006,Family Support Agency, Dublin.

  • Duncan, S. and Strell, M. ( 2004 ) , “Combining Lone Motherhood and Paid Work: The Rationality Mistake and Norse Social Policy” ,Journal of European Social Policy 14:1, 41-54.
  • European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions ( 2004 ) ,Birthrate and Family Issues in an Enlarged Europe,European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions, Dublin.
  • The Law Reform Commission ( 2004 ) ,Rights and Duties of Cohabitees,ConsultationPaper,The Law Reform Commission, Dublin.
  • Department of Social and Family Affairs ( 2004 ) ,Statistical Report on Social Welfare Services 2003, The Stationery Office, Dublin.
  • Jenson, J.

    , M. , and Fraser, M. , W. , ( 2005 ) . “A Risk and Resilience Framework for Child, Youth, and Family Policy.

    Social Policy for Children and Families.

  • Michael Brown ( 2005 ) .Social policy study,Ireland, Dublin
  • Murphy, M. , ( 2008 ) .

    “Ideas, Interests and Institutions: Explaining Irish Social Security Policy.”Combat Poverty Agency, Working Paper Series, September 2008.

  • O’Sullivan, E. , ( 2008 ) .

    “Chapter 4 – Residential Child Welfare in Ireland, 1965-2008: an lineation of policy, statute law and pattern: a paper prepared for the Commission to Inquire into Child Abuse.”School of Social Work and Social Policy, Trinity College Dublin

  • Rush, M. , ( 2009 ) . “The Two Worlds of Father Politics in the Republic of Ireland: The Norse Model or the United States Model? ”University College Dublin, Belfield Dublin.
  • HSE, ( 2012 ) . “Review of Adequacy for HSE Children and Family Services 2012.

    Tulsa, Child and Family Agency.

citizen information board. ( 2002 ) .Research and Social Policy Report: Supporting Carers 2002.Available: hypertext transfer protocol: // Last accessed 05/04/2015Trajectory of Irish Family and Social PolicyPage 1