Marxism in Socioeconomic Conditions

Developed by Karl Marx in the face of the industrial revolution and the rise of capitalist economy in the 19Thursdaycentury, Marxist theory is peculiarly concerned about the power constructions of human society in which the economic and societal fortunes are thought to play a cardinal function.

Who has power or privilege? Who has non? How do people derive their power? How do people from different societal categories interact or struggle? Those are the of import issues worth sing when it comes to Marxist literary unfavorable judgment. Since “Marxism efforts to uncover the ways in which our socioeconomic system is the ultimate beginning of our experience, ” [ 1 ] I will seek to near three literary plants, viz.Jane Eyre, Bleak House,andThe Odd Women, from a Marxist position so as to see how the texts reflects the power system of the Victorian England in which one’s socioeconomic status determines his or her position and societal interactions.

Best services for writing your paper according to Trustpilot

Premium Partner
From $18.00 per page
4,8 / 5
4,80
Writers Experience
4,80
Delivery
4,90
Support
4,70
Price
Recommended Service
From $13.90 per page
4,6 / 5
4,70
Writers Experience
4,70
Delivery
4,60
Support
4,60
Price
From $20.00 per page
4,5 / 5
4,80
Writers Experience
4,50
Delivery
4,40
Support
4,10
Price
* All Partners were chosen among 50+ writing services by our Customer Satisfaction Team

From a Marxist position, socioeconomic conditions determine people’s values and position. That is to state, those who are in power, socially or economically, are considered superior and of higher value. Here, the word “socioeconomic” involves two determinants—class standing and economic condition—which pinpoint people’s societal places in different ways. To see how category standing determines one’s position, it is inevitable to foremost analyze how classism is reflected in the texts. “Classism is, ” harmonizing to Lois Tyson, “an political orientation that equates one’s value as a human being with the societal category to which one belongs.” [ 2 ] Such a classist thought is supported by many illustrations inBleak House. Though both life in Bleak House and being treated good by their guardian Mr Jarndyce, Esther and Ada are evidently placed in different places.

Ada is a ward of Chancery in the instance of Jarndyce and Jarndyce and belongs to a higher category. By contrast, Esther is an orphan whose parents’ individualities are unknown, which excludes her from any certain category. As a consequence, she is non merely chosen as a comrade to Ada but besides given a occupation as the housekeeper in Bleak House without wage while Ada does nil but spends clip socialising and waiting for her heritage. In other words, Esther’s value is estimated by her parts to the house while Ada’s is already shown in her station. Another case is related to Charley Neckett, the girl of the bailiff Mr Neckett. After his father’s decease, Charley and her siblings, including a 5-year-old male child and an 18-month-old miss, becomes orphans. In order to take attention of the younger childs, the 13-year-old Charley plants as a washwoman every twenty-four hours to gain “sixpences and shillings” , which is hardly nil.

Furthermore, these hapless orphans are frequently abused by the locals because of their father’s profession as a debt aggregator. Mr Jarndyce can non accepts it since he believes that it is improper for Charley, whose male parent used to be in a certain societal place, to step down from her old category to work as a washerwoman, the lowest occupation for adult female at that clip. Trying to do certain the rightness of category hierarchy, Mr Jarndyce offers Charley a occupation as a retainer in his house.Not merely are the characters valued by their category standing, but they are internalized with classist political orientations. Classists hold that “people at the top of the societal graduated table are of course superior to those below them.” [ 3 ] Sir Leicester Dedlock’s premise of his privilege demonstrates this thought. As a Baronet, the blue blood “supposes all his dependants to be utterly bereft of single characters, purposes or opinions” , and believes that “he was born to supplant the necessity of their holding any” .

[ 4 ] He takes for granted his high quality and authorization over those who belongs to take down categories and imposes his force per unit area, through his loyal attorney Mr Tulkinghorn, upon people like Mr Lawrence Boythorn who stand in the manner of his false “right.” In add-on, classists believe that “those from the highest societal category should keep all the places of power and leading because they are of course suited to such roles.” [ 5 ] This may account for Mrs Pardiggle’s premise of her right to walk into the brick maker’s place and state him how to act. Likewise, such a hierarchal political orientation is besides profoundly rooted in the heads of the low-class people, though in a reversed form. Mrs Rouncewell, for illustration, believes that her kids are born to be retainers like her and are supposed to act decently harmonizing to their inferior places.

That is why she shows great uneasiness and concern when she discovers her 2nd son’s involvement and endowment in technology. She is afraid that her boy, driven by his aspiration, will non be satisfied with the place of a steward and therefore may step outside the category boundary.Apart from category standing, economic status besides takes a decisive portion in finding people’s position. Marxists think that “the material involvements of the dominant societal category find how people see human existence.” [ 6 ] At the beginning ofJane Eyre, we are introduced to small Jane, the hapless relation to the Reed’s.

Because of her inferior fiscal position and category standing ( her female parent is married beneath her category ) , she is looked down upon as “less than a servant” and often bullied and abused by her cousin John in a “master-slave” form. Jo, the traversing sweeper in theBleak House, leads an even harder life. Unlike Jane who at least has her aunt to depend upon, Jo is stateless and therefore is put into the class of the lower class.

Due to his poorness, he is ever moved on from one topographic point to another and is considered instrumental for people like Inspector Bucket and Mr Tulkinghorn, the representatives of the legal system at that clip who bear no understanding for Jo’s suffering status.While poorness deprives people of power and position, wealth empowers people with privileges, which makes the spread between the “haves” and “have-nots” even larger. Mr Brocklehurst inJane Eyreestablishes Lowood school for hapless people’s kids to cultivates humbleness among them and mortifies in them “the worldly sentiment of pride.” [ 7 ] “My program in conveying these misss, ” he claims, “is non to habituate them to wonts of luxury and indulgence, but to render them hardy, patient, self-denying.” [ 8 ] Furthermore, under the camouflage of spiritual mission, he misinterprets the words of Jesus for his ain intent to asseverate his authorization and makes the hapless misss voluntarily remain in their inferior places.

His lip service and premise of high quality is reflected if we examine how he views the students and his household members with dual criterions. The students, in his sentiment, should all be plain, shame-faced with no appetency for luxury since they are born to be hapless and inferior. By contrast, his married woman and girls, due to their higher economic position, are endowed with the right to be “splendidly attired” and “elaborately curled.” [ 9 ]Since money determines one’s societal position, the alteration in one’s economic status may ensue in his or her societal mobility. The illustrations of Mr. Widdowson and Mrs. Rouncewell’s boy exemplify how people may mount up the societal ladder with the entree of money, though in different ways.

Mr. Widdowson, as depicted inThe Odd Women, used to belong to the working category. He begins to work at an early age and, because of his deficiency of profitable concern wont, he can merely back up himself by working as a clerk, which makes him believe that he “was doomed to work for other people who were turning rich.” [ 10 ] Fortunately, he has a brother, “a born money-maker” who leaves Widdowson a big amount of money after his sudden early decease.

With the heritage, Widdowson is made instantly from a working-class to a gentleman. Here, Widdowson’s alteration of position seems to supply a glance of what Marxists call the capitalist construction, in which one peculiar category ( the businessperson ) owns the agency of economic production while the labor, normally the on the job category, are oppressed and exploited to sell labour and increase capital. [ 11 ] This may account for Mr. Widdowson’s apparently exaggerated description when he refers to the passage of his position: “In one day—in one hour—I passed from bondage to freedom, from poorness to more than comfort.” [ 12 ] Unlike Mr.

Widdowson’s manner of traveling upwards through heritage, Mrs Rouncewell’s boy inBleak House, as Vanden Bossche observes, follows “the middle-class theoretical account of the self-made adult male who elevates himself through single industry to the position of successful entrepreneur.” [ 13 ] Alternatively of remaining at Chesney Wold and going a steward as his female parent wants, he goes to the Fe state in the North and subsequently manages to go an ironmaster. He can be seen as the peculiar emerging businessperson who creates wealth through industry and trade. Empowered by his wealth, he moves up to a higher societal station and hence can negociate with the Dedlocks without the feeling of lower status.Compared with Mr.

Widdownson and Mrs Rouncewell’s boy who rise up, either through heritage or self-made calling, into the middle class, the Madden misss inThymineHvitamin E Odd Womenare less lucky since they are forced to confront a downward mobility. The Madden misss used to belong to the in-between category because of their father’s respectable profession as a physician. Unfortunately, Dr Madden’s sudden decease drives the whole household into poorness, which forces the girls to do a life by themselves. Alice and Virginia becomes governess while Monica works as a store miss, which signifies the ruin of their societal position from the in-between category.One’s socioeconomic status, while finding his or her societal place, besides decides his or her societal interactions with other people.

The hierarchy construction in the Victorian England requires that people’s behaviours should be restricted within the categories they belong to. That is to state, they are non supposed to develop relationships with people from a higher or lower station. We may see that this thought is held by many characters from the texts: Mrs Fairfax, the housekeeper of Thornfield, is non willing to blend with the “lower” retainers for fright that she may lose her authorization if non maintaining a distance from them ; Robert Rouncewell, ashamed of Rosa’s inferior place as a retainer, would non O.

K. the unequal battle between his boy and Rosa unless Rose quits her occupation and leaves Chesney Wold ; even Miss Barfoot and Rhoda, “who attempts to give the ‘odd’ adult females plenty practical instruction to enable them to last economically without get marrieding, ” exclude the propertyless adult females from their strategy of emancipation. [ 14 ]Furthermore, the narratives besides tell us what would go on if one does non act decently harmonizing to the hierarchy system. Lady Dedlock stairss outside her category by holding relationship with Captain Hawdon whose position is much lower than hers.

Besides, she delivers their illicit girl Esther. As a consequence, she is punished for her errors for the remainder of her life and dies in wretchedness and shame. Another illustration of go againsting the category construction would be Jane Eyre. As a governess, she is non supposed to fall in love with his employer Mr Rochester because of their unequal position. That is why Jane is trapped in the changeless battle between following her bosom and acting harmonizing to the hierarchal construction. That is besides why Mrs Fairfax, after detecting the secret love between Jane and Rochester, is afraid that “the employer-employee relationship” between them “may turn into an illicit sexual and economic exchange.” [ 15 ] Peoples may inquire why Jane, alternatively of being punished for her stepping outside the category boundary like Lady Dedlock, ends up with a happy matrimony with Rochester. The ground is that non merely category, but economic factor is involved here in Jane’s case.

With a farther scrutiny of the text, we may happen that the happy matrimony is based on Jane’s economic independency from Mr Rochester. By procuring her uncle’s heritage, Jane non merely becomes financially equal to Rochester, but besides improves her societal position, which makes her brotherhood with Rochester a proper one.Unlike Jane who wants a matrimony of equality and true love, many other characters merely see matrimony as a socioeconomic contract. In other words, they develop intimate relationships with others simply with pecuniary concerns. Miss Ingram inJane Eyreis a typical illustration who makes attempts to address Rochester merely because he is affluent. “Surely she can non truly like him, or non like him with true fondness! ” [ 16 ] That is Jane’s decision based on her observation of Miss Ingram. “If she did, ” as Jane says, “she need non coin her smilings so extravagantly, flash her glimpses so unremittingly, industry poses so luxuriant, graces so multitudinous.

” [ 17 ] Miss Ingram pleases Rochester in every manner with the individual intent of hold oning a rich hubby. Ironically, after Rochester spreads a rumor that his luck was non a 3rd of what was supposed, the thought of his “ insolvency cooled, or instead extinguished, her flam in a moment.” [ 18 ] Likewise, Guppy’s chase of Esther inBleak Houseis besides out of monetary intent. After seeing Esther’s changed face disfigured by her disease, Guppy is so aghast that he withdraws his old matrimony proposal, which shows his shallow fondness towards Esther’s once-beautiful visual aspect.

However, “when Guppy realizes Esther’s connexion to the affluent Lady Decklock, ” as Gail Turley Houston says in a mocking tone, “he pursues her as though it were a job.” [ 19 ] The crisp contrast of Guppy’s attitudes towards Esther sardonically reveals his money-driven motivation in love and matrimony. A similar motivation can be traced in Gissing’s supporter Monica who “accepts matrimony as an economic transaction.” [ 20 ] That is why we find that each of her suers is put under her pecuniary appraisal. Mr. Bullivant belongs to the proper category, but his deficiency of money and a comfortable calling makes him instantly and wholly out of Monica’s consideration. We can see how Monica bluffly rejects him: “How would it be possible for you to back up a married woman? ” [ 21 ] Showing no involvement in his hope for possible chances in the unsure hereafter, she throws him a cold advice: “I think you ought to wait until you truly have prospects.

” [ 22 ] Widdowson, on the other manus, appears to be a suited campaigner since he possesses a big sum of money every bit good as a nice societal position. “After all, he was non a comrade to be ashamed of.” [ 23 ] That is Monica’s decision after she notices Widdowson’s “very good boots” , “gold links” , “gold watch-guard” [ 24 ] that imply his position and wealth. Alternatively of developing a romantic relationship, Monica seems to be doing a fiscal dealing: every bit long as she can be rescued “from her being as a store girl” and be provided with a better life, she is willing to transact herself as a comrade to Widdowson and accept a “marital endeavor presided over by her husband.” [ 25 ] In this manner, while ciphering others’ worth in monetary footings, she besides turns herself into a trade good waiting to be evaluated by her purchasers.

As Tyson points out, “literature is a merchandise of the socioeconomic and hence ideological conditions of the clip and topographic point in which it was written.” [ 26 ] Hence, by analysingJane Eyre, Bleak House,andThymineHvitamin E Odd Womenthrough a Marxist lens, we have a glance of the power system every bit good as the political orientations that support it in the Victorian England. Generally, those who are of higher Stationss or of better economic conditions get the upper manus in the power construction. Yet what is deserving detecting is that category and money are non of the same importance in the three texts.Jane EyreandBleak House, published in the mid-nineteenth century when classist political orientation prevails, seem to concentrate more on category differentiation and the hierarchal system.

The Odd Women, on the other manus, appears at the terminal of the 19th century when the 2nd industrial revolution witnesses a great addition in economic growing. As a consequence, most people are embedded with capitalist political orientation. That is why Brewer observes that G.i.ing depicts all human interaction “as preponderantly economic in nature.” [ 27 ] On the whole, despite the difference in their primary concerns, the three texts reveals that socioeconomic conditions are the ultimate determiners of people’s position and societal interactions.Plants CitedBrewer, Lawton A.

“George Gissing’s Manifesto:The Odd WomenandThe Unclassed.”Nineteenth-century Gender Surveies. Spring 2008. 28 Dec.

2013 & lt ; hypertext transfer protocol: //www.ncgsjournal.com/issue41/brewer.

htm & gt ; .Bronte, Charlotte.Jane Eyre. London: The Electric Book Company Ltd, 1998.Dicken, Charles.Bleak House. Hertfordshire: Wordsworth Editions Limited, 1993.

G.i.ing, George.The Odd Women.

F.p. 1893.Habib, M. A.

R.A History of Literary Criticism: From Plato to the Present. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing, 2005.Houston, Gail Turley.Devouring Fictions: Gender, Class, and Hunger in Dickens’s Novels.

Illinois: Southern Illinois University Press, 1994.Rawlinson, Barbara. “Devil’s Advocate: George Gissing’s Approach to the Women Question.”The Gissing Journal.

April 1997: 1-14.Selden, Roman et Al.A Reader’s Guide to Contemporary Literary Theory. Edinburgh: Pearson Education Limited, 2005Tyson, Lois.Critical Theory Today.

New York: Taylor & A ; Francis Group, 2006.Vanden Bossche, Chris. “Class Discourse and Popular Agency in Bleak House.”Victorian Surveies.

Fall 2004: 7-31.Washington, Kate. “Rochester’s Mistresss: Marriage, Sex, and Economic Exchange in Jane Eyre.”Unequal Exchange: Gender and Economies of Power.29 Dec.

2013 & lt ; hypertext transfer protocol: //hdl.handle.net/2027/spo.ark5583.0012.004 & gt ; .1