Mass Transit Is A Common Goal Social Policy Essay

Achieving sustainable conveyance through the proviso of mass theodolite is a common end in all urban countries. Despite this impression, current theodolite substructure is designed in a manner that users are assumed to be normal and able-bodied which frequently led to exclusion to those who face troubles in utilizing the theodolite ( Audirac, 2008 ; Bromley, Matthews, & A ; Thomas, 2007 ) . In 2001, Canada has about 3.4 million people enduring from assorted types of disablements. Statistics Canada ( 2002 ) further reported that Quebec ranks following to Ontario with a high handicapped population ( 15 old ages old and above ) at 568,800 individuals. Based on the Participation and Activity Limitation Survey ( PALS ) ( Statistics Canada, 2002 ) , around 135,000 grownups with disablements could non utilize public transit services ; while 59,000 grownups could non go locally by auto and another 179,000 persons who used public transit have encountered troubles. The Table de concertation diethylstilbestrols aines de l’ile de Montreal ( 2009 ) likewise reported more than 101,000 seniors sing multiple damages and that mobility, legerity, and trouble jobs increases in prevalence with age ( Statistics Canada, 2004 ) . These damages frequently have serious deductions in footings of entree to chances in the metropolis peculiarly in utilizing public transit such as the Metro.

The Metro has a long history of development which dated back in October 1966 when it was foremost inaugurated. The belowground prosaic web system started in 1962 at Place Ville Marie ( Boisvert, 2002 ; Durmisevic, 1999 ) and its subsequent development was linked to the metro station ( Maitland, 1992 ) . In 2004, the downtown sections of the belowground metropolis were rebranded and given the nameRESO which is borrowed from the Gallic wordreseau or web. Although the belowground prosaic web is considered private instead than public infinite ( Boisvert, 2002 ) , the web was built as a manner to associate users to the theodolite system, act as a safety during rough winter/summer season, connects to several countries such asshopping promenades and a host of other installations and separate walkers from auto circulation ( Barker, 1986 ; Boivin, 1991 ; Durmisevic, 1999 ; Maitland, 1992 ) . The belowground infinite allows Metro users to link their trip to work, leisure or shopping activities within the RESO. Despite several benefits, these webs pose limitations to users sing physical disablements ( Hagg & A ; El-Geneidy, 2010 ) and could take to exclusion from accessing such comfortss.

The overall aim of this paper is to set about a comparative analysis of physical barriers to handiness of the Metro station connected to the RESO web. Failure to spread out and prolong handiness options for these persons could take to farther negative societal and economic effects of their wellbeing. Overlooking their demands would besides take to favoritism and exclusion to chances in metropoliss where they live. As such, society has a great function of guaranting that public theodolite is non merely portrayed as portion of the urban substructure but as a manner to guarantee inclusivity and handiness to all users.

We Will Write a Custom Essay Specifically
For You For Only $13.90/page!


order now

Accessibility as an Essential Component in Land Use and Transportation Planning

Accessibility is an of import feature of the geographics of infinite and is often included as a end in transit and land usage planning, and edifice design. In transit planning, handiness is defined as the easiness with which activities may be reached and conducted by agencies of a peculiar transit system ( El-Geneidy & A ; Levinson, 2006 ; Iwarsson & A ; Stahl, 2003 ; Zhu, Liu, & A ; Yeow, 2006 ) . However from a societal point of position, handiness besides entails a person-environment interaction. Harmonizing to Iwarsson & A ; Stahl ( 2003 ) , the construct denotes an brush between a individual or group ‘s functional capacity and design and demands of the physical environment which is supported by norms and criterions. In understanding restraints people encounter to the physical environment, Bromley, Matthews, & A ; Thomas ( 2007 ) identified two positions of disability/impairments. The medical or single theoretical account looks at a individual ‘s mental or physical calamities that inhibit one ‘s normal day-to-day activities. On the other manus, the societal theoretical account positions disablement as a consequence of society ‘s failure to supply a more accessible and user-friendly installations and structural design. This means that while an person may hold physical disablements, such as being unable to walk ; the same person besides faces disablement in accessing a edifice or transit installation without any proviso of inclines, an lift, among others. Ease of making possible chances could be hampered as a consequence of unaccessible installations. Therefore an inappropriate, even erroneous, conceptualisation of disablement leads to hapless proviso of transit for the handicapped ( Barrett, Heycock, Hick, & A ; Judge 2003 ) .

Land usage and conveyance planning influences handiness through the design of the physical environment. In fact, integrating cosmopolitan handiness ( or cosmopolitan design ) has become an of import consideration in edifice, landscape design, land usage and conveyance planning ( Audirac, 2008 ; Bromley, Matthews, & A ; Thomas, 2007 ; Iwarsson & A ; Stahl, 2003 ; Project Universal Access, 2010 ; Societe Logique, 2003 ) . Universal design aims to simplify life for every one of all ages, sizes, and abilities by doing the bing and future built environment and merchandises useable by more people. Harmonizing to AlterGo ( 1992 ) , holding accessible installations intends to run into the demands of parents with kids in passenger cars or saunterers, aged people every bit good as persons with decreased mobility. Integrating rules of cosmopolitan handiness entails enabling all users to make their finish from a certain tract system by leting a important figure of the population to go independently ( Project Universal Access, 2010 ; Audirac, 2008 ) .

Underground infinite development is progressively going of import in many metropoliss such as Montreal due to challenges in spacial planning of substructure and edifices. The International Tunneling and Underground Space Association Committee on Underground Space ( ITACUS, 2009 ) noted that belowground infinite provides new infinites for substructure, services and public-service corporations without claiming valuable infinite on the surface. The consequence is that metropoliss keep their valued public infinites. In states where urban infinite on the land degree is limited for development ; metropolis governments, belongings developers and private investors are taking advantage of developing belowground infinites. Furthermore, the research of Durmisevic & A ; Sariyildiz ( 2001 ) showed that safety and comfort are among the most of import facets that should be considered in the design of the substructure of belowground infinites. AlterGo ( 2003 ) further emphasized that integrating cosmopolitan handiness in belowground infinites allows for unchained physical entree to edifices or sites and ensures that services are accessible by all users at the same clip. Therefore, extinguishing barriers and using cosmopolitan accessibility/design to the physical environment is an of import move to better handiness of Metro Stationss.

Accessibility Policies in Montrealand Institutional Coordination

Montreal ‘s Master Plan ( 2002 ) aims to heighten the perceptual experience and image of public transit in order to promote its usage. Public infinites around tube, commuter train and intermodal Stationss, peculiarly the waiting countries, warrant particular attending to ease entree and make a safe and pleasant environment that meets the demands of every type of user. Action 14 of the Master Plan farther emphasized design rules in the locality of public transit entree points peculiarly in footings of easing connexions between coachs and metro. A figure of states have already implemented cosmopolitan handiness policies which are anchored from disablement rights as a basis for advancing societal inclusion in the usage of public transit and entree to edifices such as the United States of America through the Americans with Disabilities Act ( ADA ) and United Kingdom through the Disability Discrimination Act ( DDA ) . Montreal has yet to come up with a comprehensive cosmopolitan accessibility/design policy similar to the 1s implemented in Toronto and Winnipeg. The Montreal Transportation Plan, on the other manus, mentioned cosmopolitan entree as a system-wide construct which is apparent through the deployment of low-floor coachs and supplying on-demand paratransit services for handicapped users. However, the overall physical connexion of the whole transit system is non clearly articulated in the program in footings of criterions and/or design guidelines.

As a response to the Montreal Transportation Plan Despite, the Societe de Transport de Montreal ( STM ) has adopted acorporate policy sing cosmopolitan entree in order to cut down the figure of barriers forestalling people with functional damages from utilizing its public theodolite web ( Societe de Transport de Montreal, 2009a ) . Aside from supplying paratransit services, STM has late retrofitted five Metro Stationss along the orange line that are now accessible for wheelchair users ( Societe de Transport de Montreal, 2009b ) . Bonaventure station on the green line, meanwhile, is partly accessible ( i.e. from train platform to terminus ) . Supplying accessible Stationss along this line linking to the belowground metropolis is still under reappraisal and consideration. Despite these developments, much of the attempts are directed towards helping those who lack personal mobility and are wheelchair-bound. Covering with this most desperate and seeable group represents merely one section of the handicapped population. Small attending has been paid to the demands of other mobility-impaired groups, including those who are blind or visually impaired every bit good as persons with no medical/physical damages yet still encounter restraints in utilizing the public theodolite ( Marston, Golledge, & A ; Costanzo, 1997 ) .

Institutional coordination besides plays an of import function in forcing for handiness betterments. The City of Montreal ( 2007 ) has recognized several disablement associations that cater the demands of people with functional damages through taking barriers to handiness. These groups besides portion their expertness with the boroughs and cardinal sections of the authorities in the amplification and completion of these enterprises. Presently, Montreal has six major spouses composed of 130 organisations devoted to progressing the concerns of people with disablements. These organisations lobby to the Ministry of Transport Quebec, the Societe de transport de Montreal ( STM ) , Ville de Montreal, among others, so that the construct of cosmopolitan handiness is recognized and respected for individuals with disablements peculiarly with mention to the public conveyance.

Methodology

An handiness audit of Montreal ‘s Metro Stationss and the belowground metropolis was conducted on 21-28 February 2010. The intent of the physical audit is to measure the functional handiness of the train and the substructure for handicapped users. The audits have been designed to take history of the user ‘s journey from the land degree to utilizing the Metro. In order to bring forth information in this survey, the undermentioned procedures were undertaken.

  1. Choice of 3 types of disablements as sample units of analysis. This research selected those who experience physical disablements such as wheelchair-bound users and people with ocular damages and the 1s sing social/environmental disablements such as adult females with child saunterers as sample units for this survey. Statistics Canada ( 2002 ) reported that 121,400 people experience ocular disablements, while 418,030 people experient mobility jobs in Quebec ( including Montreal ) . These disablements may hold deductions in accessing public conveyance. Although statistics for households with immature kids in Montreal are non readily available, it is assumed that a important figure of this population are utilizing the Metro to entree different finishs for assorted intents.
  2. Development of an handiness audit checklist. A simplified checklist was created based from the Americans with Disabilities Act ( ADA ) universal accessibility/design criterions ( Access Board, 2002 ; Adaptive Environments Center & A ; Barrier Free Environments, 1995 ) . The modified checklist was used to scrutinize several installations of the Stationss linking the RESO that would help people with disablements.
  3. Choice of Metro Stationss. There are 25 chief entree points from the six Metro Stationss that are connected to the RESO. Figure 1 shows the connectivity of the whole station from the land level up to the train platform. In this research, two chief entree ( entry/exit ) points from each station were purposively selected for audit which includes:
  • Metro Peel: 1011 Boul. de Maisonneuve west ( Peel east issue – Access Point 1 ) and 1465 herb of grace Stanley ( Access Point 2 ) ,
  • Metro McGill: 2021 herb of grace Union ( Access Point 1 ) and Boul. de Maisonneuve west beside Eaton Center ( Access Point 2 ) ,
  • Metro Place-des-Arts: 155 herb of grace du President Kennedy ( Access Point 1 ) and 2020 herb of grace de Bleury ( Access Point 2 ) ,
  • Metro Place d’Armes: 960 herb of grace Saint Urbain ( Access Point 1 ) and rue Viger west entree point ( Access Point 2 ) ,
  • Metro Square Victoria: herb of grace Saint Antoine ( Access Point 1 ) and Cote du Beaver Hall ( Access Point 2 ) , and,
  • Metro Bonaventure: herb of grace des Canadiens-de-Montreal ( Access Point 1 ) and 955 herb of grace de la Cathedrale ( Access Point 2 ) .

Furthermore, Figure 2 shows the connectivity of the Stationss to the RESO and train platform. Based from this diagram, informations collected and audited include the figure and type of doors, figure of stepss and escalators, kerb pavings and presence of path maps.

Analysis and Discussion

Montreal ‘s Metro is a Swift, convenient, and cheap, and is one of the most architecturally typical metro systems in the universe. The Stationss of the Metro are linked to the 32-kilometer resistance prosaic web ( RESO ) covering an estimated country of 12square kilometres ( 4.6sqmi ) of residential and commercial composites in downtown Montreal.

Land LevelAccessibility

Curb pavings outside the Stationss provide handiness to the three identified users in this research. While most of the Stationss are accessible at street degree, Metro Square Victoria ‘s Saint-Antoine and Metro Bonaventure ‘s Delaware la Cathedrale entree points pose challenges for wheelchair users and adult females with saunterers since one has to take stepss to make the station. The European Conference of Ministers of Transport ( ECMT, 2006 ) noted that a presence of a individual measure at the entryway or a curb without a incline in the route outside a station can do the terminus unaccessible to people with certain disablements. Although the Stationss are accessible on the land, it was noted that curb inclines were built far from the Metro Stationss. The door besides serves as barrier for the three types of users. One has to exercise considerable attempt merely to acquire indoors, and would likely be more hard for a handicapped individual and the aged to utilize. This job was even documented by CBC News ( 1989 ) observing that one has to exercise 34 kgs merely to open the door. Skiding doors can be easier for adult females with child saunterers and besides require less wheelchair maneuvering infinite ( Access Board, 2002 ) . Route maps are omnipresent within the Stationss although discernability and size of text used in the maps could present a challenge for the visually impaired.

Table 1. Consequences of handiness audit on land degree entree of Metro Stationss

Station / Facilities

Peel

McGill

Place-des-Arts

Topographic point d’Armes

Square Victoria

Bonaventure

AP 1

AP 2

AP 1

AP 2

AP 1

AP 2

AP 1

AP 2

AP 1

AP 2

AP 1

AP 2

Kerb Ramp

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Number of stairss in stepss

0

0

2

0

0

0

0

0

22

0

0

4

Number of doors

2

2

2

3

4

1

4

3

3

5

2

2

Type of doors

Second

Second

Second

P/S

P/R

Second

Second

Phosphorus

P/S

P/R

Second

Second

Path Maps

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Note:

For type of doors: P – push/pull, S – slide, R – revolving, A – machine rifle

Interior Accessibility ( Terminal and RESO )

The proviso of escalators inside the terminus and RESO improves handiness. However, a figure of Stationss provide uni-directional escalators ( normally merely traveling up from the platform to terminus ) which pose trouble for adult females with saunterers and wheelchair users. The jobs are farther compounded whenever these installations break down or are under fix. The figure of stairss besides poses challenges for the users. The absence of markers on the stairss could present hazards for visually impaired users. The longest stepss can be found at Bonaventure and Square Victoria Stationss. The most accessible station, on the other manus, is Place d’Armes. Harmonizing to Access Board ( 2002 ) , doors that require both custodies to run every bit good as revolving doors are considered unaccessible for individuals utilizing wheelchairs and saunterers. Signage, which assists manner happening around the station and RESO, presents an obstruction peculiarly on supplying information on handiness for individuals with disablements ( Hagg & A ; El-Geneidy, 2010 ) . Within the terminus, it was observed that handiness signage for individuals with disablements are non posted decipherably within the premises. Another ill planned accessible installation is the arrangement of lone bannisters for mobility impaired users along the corridors of the belowground web. These bannisters were non connected continuously from the terminus to the nearest edifice or the Metro station ‘s entree point.

Table 2. Consequences of handiness audit on interior entree of Metro Stationss

Station / Facilities

Peel

McGill

Place-des-Arts

Topographic point d’Armes

Square Victoria

Bonaventure

AP 1

AP 2

AP 1

AP 2

AP 1

AP 2

AP 1

AP 2

AP 1

AP 2

AP 1

AP 2

Escalator clauses

No

Yes

Yes

No

Yes

Yes

No

No

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Direction of Escalator clauses

Uracil

Uracil

Uracil

U/D

U/D

U/D

U/D

U/D

Condition of escalators

Tungsten

Tungsten

Tungsten

Tungsten

Tungsten

Tungsten

Tungsten

Tungsten

Number of stairss in stepss

40

28

32

57

21

41

3

3

42

60

72

42

Number of doors

0

0

0

6

0

0

0

4

0

2

5

0

Type of doors

Phosphorus

P/A

Phosphorus

R/A

Path Maps

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Note:

For way of escalators: U – traveling up, D – traveling down

For status of escalators: W – working, NW – non working

For type of doors: P – push/pull, S – slide, R – revolving, A – machine rifle

Terminal/RESO to Train Platform Accessibility

Similar to the installations within the station terminus and RESO, accessing the train platform presents restraints to individuals with disablements. The narrow stepss and uni-directional escalators from the terminus to the platform inhibits handiness for adult females with child saunterers and wheelchair users. The spread between the train and the platform presents challenge for those in wheelchair unless STM is informed in front in order to deploy a incline ( Hagg & A ; El-Geneidy, 2010 ) . Furthermore, strong colour contrasts and/or haptic tracts set into floors may be used to help persons with a ocular damage ( Access Board, 2002 ; Adaptive Environments Center & A ; Barrier Free Environments, 1995 ) . However, the proviso of clear markers on the platform is still limited in most Stationss. Another obstruction for wheelchair users and visually impaired is the absence of platform markers where they could ship or debark even though there are designated countries for individuals with disablements to sit inside the train.

Table 3. Consequences of handiness audit on train platform entree of Metro Stationss

Station / Facilities

Peel

McGill

Place-des-Arts

Topographic point d’Armes

Square Victoria

Bonaventure

AP 1

AP 2

AP 1

AP 2

AP 1

AP 2

AP 1

AP 2

AP 1

AP 2

AP 1

AP 2

Escalator clauses

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

No

No

No

No

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Direction of Escalator clauses

Uracil

U/D

Uracil

Uracil

Uracil

Uracil

Uracil

Uracil

Condition of escalators

Northwest

Northwest

Tungsten

Tungsten

Tungsten

Tungsten

Tungsten

Tungsten

Number of stairss in stepss

22

22

30

30

21

24

30

30

28

28

32

32

Path Maps

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Note:

For way of escalators: U – traveling up, D – traveling down

For status of escalators: W – working, NW – non working

While STM is strong in its stance of cosmopolitan handiness, the usage of mass conveyance can be attributed to the person ‘s perceptual experience of whether the installations located within the theodolite are user-friendly or discriminating. Harmonizing to Wener and Evans ( 2007 ) , “the pick of transposing manner is the consequence of single determinations that are strongly influenced by a broad assortment direction, design, substructure, and policy determinations by authoritiess and theodolite agencies” .

Decisions

The physical connectivity of Montreal ‘s Metro station to the belowground web provides chances for users to entree both the train and edifices, serve as a manner of dividing walkers and traffic which leads to better mobility of each group and as a safety during rough conditions. However, non all users are able to entree both Metro and the belowground web every bit seamless as possible. Wheelchair users, visually impaired individuals and adult females with child saunterers encounter restraints to handiness in one signifier or another. At the land degree, the door entirely provides a biggest challenge for the three types of users given that it takes a batch of attempt merely to open it. The stepss and uni-directional escalators besides pose troubles for them. In the event of escalator dislocation and fixs, wheelchair users and adult females with child saunterers would experience helpless in traveling in/out of the Metro as good traveling around the belowground web. Indeed, land usage and conveyance planning influences handiness through the design of the physical environment by guaranting that topographic points and environment should be barrier-free, inclusive and accessible to all. It is noted that cosmopolitan handiness policies are still at the earliest phase of development in Montreal compared to other metropoliss in Canada and that the belowground web linked to the Metro are in private owned. As such, overall retrofitting and betterment of the Stationss would take some clip to implement. The simple handiness audit of this research shows the demand to integrate little betterments to the physical handiness of the Metro Stationss to let a figure of individuals with disablements to utilize the system. These include:

  • Supplying announcement/information on STM web site or through Montreal newspaper of any dislocations or fixs undertaken on the escalators.
  • Supplying clear platform markers where wheelchair users or other individuals with disablements could embark/disembark the train.
  • Guaranting that the doors taking to the Metro station and belowground web be good maintained and easy to open.
  • Although it would take some clip for Metro Stationss to accomplish a barrier-free handiness ; the STM, City of Montreal every bit good as other concerned stakeholders could place which Metro Stationss that are non excessively hard for individuals with disablements to entree the system.

Not all users are able to afford driving a motor vehicle, therefore, utilizing public conveyance becomes an indispensable constituent for individuals with disablements to accomplish productiveness and independency.

Mentions

Access Board. ( 2002 ) . Americans with Disabilities Act ( ADA ) Accessibility Guidelines for Buildings and Facilities. Children ( Vol. 1111 ) . Washington D.C. , USA: U.S. Architectural and Transportation Barriers Compliance Board. Retrieved on 18 February 2010 from hypertext transfer protocol: //www.access-board.gov/adaag/html/adaag.htm.

Adaptive Environments Center, I. , & A ; Barrier Free Environments, I. ( 1995 ) . The Americans with Disabilities Act Checklist for Readily Achievable Barrier Removal. USA.

AlterGo ( 1992 ) . Access-Ability for Persons with Disabilities. A Practical Guide for Organizers of Public Events. The Regional Association for the Recreation of Disabled Persons of the Island of Montreal.

Audirac, I. ( 2008 ) . Accessing Transit as Universal Design. Journal of Planning Literature, 23 ( 1 ) , 4-16.

Barker, M. ( 1986 ) . Toronto ‘s Underground Pedestrian System. Tunelling and Underground Space Technology, 1 ( 2 ) , 145-151.

Barrett, E. , Heycock, M. , Hick, D. , & A ; Judge, E. ( 2003 ) . The instance of the Leeds Transport Strategy. Policy Studies, 24 ( 4 ) , 227-242.

Boisvert, M. ( 2002 ) . From connexity to connectivity: Enhancing the efficiency of interior paseos with the current extensions of the Montreal ‘s indoor metropolis. In Urban Underground Space: A Resource for Cities. Torino, Italy.

Boivin, D. ( 1991 ) . Montreal ‘s Underground Network: A Study of the Downtown Pedestrian System, Tunelling and Underground Space Technology, 6 ( 1 ) , 83-91.

Bromley, R. , Matthews, D. & A ; Thomas, C. J. ( 2007 ) . City centre handiness for wheelchair users: The consumer position and the planning deductions. Cities, 24 ( 3 ) , 229-241.

CBC ( 1989 ) . “The heavy door phenomenon” , Canadian Broadcasting Centre Digital Archive. Retrieved on 22 March 2010 from hypertext transfer protocol: //archives.cbc.ca/science_technology/transportation/topics/1099-6127/ .

City of Montreal. ( 2002 ) . Montreal Master Plan. Retrieved on 09 March 2010 from hypertext transfer protocol: //ville.montreal.qc.ca/portal/page? _pageid=2762,3099643 & A ; _dad=portal & A ; _schema=PORTAL

City of Montreal. ( 2007 ) . A barrier-free metropolis: Montreal has cosmopolitan handiness at bosom! Retrieved on 09 March 2010 from hypertext transfer protocol: //www.altergo.net/documents/MAJDOC70716/Montreal_A_barrier-free_city.pdf.

CRADI ( 2009 ) . Plan d’action 2008-2009. Comite regional diethylstilbestrols associations pour la deficience intellectuelle, Montreal. Retrieved on 24 March 2010 from hypertext transfer protocol: //cradi.com/nos-publications/plan-daction-2008-2009.html.

Durmisevic, S. ( 1999 ) . The hereafter of the belowground infinite. Cities, 16 ( 4 ) , 233-245.

Durmisevic, S. & A ; Sariyildiz, S. ( 2001 ) . A systematic quality appraisal of belowground infinites – public conveyance Stationss. Cities, 18 ( 1 ) , 13-23.

ECMT. ( 2006 ) . Bettering Transport Accessibility for All: Guide to Good Practice. European Conference of Ministers of Transport, Paris: OECD.

El-Geneidy, A. , & A ; Levinson, D. ( 2006 ) . Access to Finishs: Development of Accessibility Measures. Transportation Research. Minnesota, USA.

Ex Aequo ( 2008 ) . Transportation objectives. Retrieved on 24 March 2010 from hypertext transfer protocol: //www.exaequo.net/spip.php? article16.

Hagg, M. & A ; El-Geneidy, A. ( 2010 ) . Making Montreal ‘s Indoor City Accessible for People with Disabilities. In Transportation Research Board 89th Annual Meeting. Washington D.C. , USA.

ITACUS. ( 2009 ) . Belowground Space: Q & A ; A. International Tunneling and Underground Space Association Committee on Underground Space, Switzerland. Retrieved on 10 February 2010 from hypertext transfer protocol: //www.ita-aites.org/cms/fileadmin/filemounts/CUS_Ressources/Pdf/itacus_wp_09.pdf.

Iwarsson, S. , & A ; Stahl, A. ( 2003 ) . Accessibility, serviceability and cosmopolitan design — placement and definition of constructs depicting person-environment relationships. Disability & A ; Rehabilitation, 25 ( 2 ) , 57-66.

Maitland, B. ( 1992 ) . Concealed metropoliss: The resistless rise of the North American interior metropolis. Cities, 9 ( 3 ) , 162-169.

Marston, J. , Golledge, R. , & A ; Costanzo, C. M. ( 1997 ) . Investigating Travel Behavior of Nondriving Blind and Vision Impaired Peoples: The Role of Public Transit. The Professional Geographer, 49 ( 2 ) , 235-245.

Pressman, N. ( 1988 ) . Developing Climate-responsive Winter Cities. Energy and Buildings, 11 ( 1-3 ) , 11-22.

Undertaking Universal Access. ( 2010 ) . Principles of Universal Access. Retrieved on 14 January 2010 from hypertext transfer protocol: //www.humantransport.org/universalaccess/page2.html.

Societe Logique ( 2003 ) . Definition of Universal Accessibility. Retrieved on 24 March 2010 from hypertext transfer protocol: //www.altergo.net/documents/accessibility_definition_en.pdf

Statistics Canada. ( 2002 ) . A Profile of Disability in Canada, 2001. 2001 Participation and Activity Limitation Survey. Ottawa. Retrieved on 18 November 2009 from hypertext transfer protocol: //www.statcan.gc.ca/pub/89-579-x/89-579-x2002001-eng.pdf.

Statistics Canada. ( 2004 ) . Canada Profile of Disability in 2001. Canada Social Trends. Ottawa. Retrieved on 18 November 2009 from hypertext transfer protocol: //www.statcan.gc.ca/pub/11-008-x/2003004/article/6804-eng.pdf.

STM. ( 2009a ) . STM Corporate Policy on Universal Accessibility. Societe de transport de Montreal. Retrieved on 08 March 2010 from hypertext transfer protocol: //www.stcum.qc.ca/English/en-bref/A-Pol_accessibilite-universelle.pdf.

STM. ( 2009b ) . Five Accessible Stations in the Metro. Societe de transport de Montreal. Retrieved on 08 March 2010 from hypertext transfer protocol: //www.stm.info/English/metro/accessibility.htm.

Table de concertation diethylstilbestrols aines de l’ile de Montreal. ( 2009 ) . Seniors ‘ mobility and transit in Montreal. Retrieved on 22 November 2009 from hypertext transfer protocol: //www.tcaim.org/Rapport_Transport_et_Mobilite_TCAIM_Summary.pdf.

Wener, R. E. , & A ; Evans, G. W. ( 2007 ) . A Morning Amble: Degrees of Physical Activity in Car and Mass Transit Commuting. Environment and Behavior, 39 ( 1 ) , 62-74.

Zacharias, J. ( 2003 ) . Montreal ‘s Underground Labyrinth. In EFUC – Konferenz 2003 on ‘Underground Construction ‘ . Suderburg, Germany.

x

Hi!
I'm Mack!

Would you like to get a custom essay? How about receiving a customized one?

Check it out