Nine Characteristics Of Policy Making Social Work Essay


Ever since the study of Sir William Beveridge ‘The Social Insurance and Allied Services ‘ study was published at the terminal of 1942 has been seen as the basis of the Welfare State as it indentified that national insurance parts would see that the province would supply societal security so that the population would be protected from the ‘cradle to the grave ‘ . This was the ideological purpose by Beveridge to better productiveness our standing in the planetary market at a clip when the universe had be financially damaged by the struggle that occurred during World War 2.

This study was the footing of public assistance support by the province and the terminal of the ‘poor jurisprudence ‘This essay will be looking at the Welfare Reform act introduced by the alliance authorities and the implied alterations of the reform in which the passage of the population being protected by the province from ‘cradle to sculpt ‘ towards a alteration the under the statement on the DWP web site to do the benefits and revenue enhancement recognition systems fairer and simpler by:Making the right inducements to acquire more people into workProtecting the most vulnerable in our societyDelivering equity to those claiming benefit and to the taxpayer.This essay will analyze as to whether or non these alterations to the public assistance act has signalled a alteration in the way for anti-poverty policies or whether these alterations have already been coming and if the reform has highlighted and presented a alteration of way in anti poorness constabularies in a more public visible radiation.It can be said that the impact of the planetary recognition crunch and subsequent recession has played a conducive portion in the alterations that are taking topographic point and has perchance garnered more public support in visible radiation of the squeezing that the recession has caused on the bags of working families.Seventy old ages ago, with Britain locked in conflict against the ground forcess of Nazi Germany, one of the most superb public retainers of his coevals was difficult at work on a study that would alter our national life for of all time.Invited by Churchill ‘s authorities to see the issue of public assistance one time triumph was won, Sir William Beveridge set out to murder the ‘five giants ‘ of Want, Disease, Ignorance, Squalor and Idleness.When his study was published at the terminal of 1942, it became the basis of a public assistance province that supported its citizens from cradle to sculpt, ostracizing the poorness and famishment of the Depression, and puting the foundations for the great post-war roar.For old ages the public assistance province was one of the glorifications of Britain ‘s democratic landscape, a memorial to the generousness and decency of human nature, offering a manus up to those luckless plenty to be born at the underside.

Best services for writing your paper according to Trustpilot

Premium Partner
From $18.00 per page
4,8 / 5
Writers Experience
Recommended Service
From $13.90 per page
4,6 / 5
Writers Experience
From $20.00 per page
4,5 / 5
Writers Experience
* All Partners were chosen among 50+ writing services by our Customer Satisfaction Team

Nine features of Policy Making

FORWARD LookThe policy-making procedure clearly defines results that the policy is designed to accomplish and, where appropriate, takes a long-run position based on statistical tendencies and informed anticipations of societal, political, economic and cultural tendencies, for at least five old ages into the hereafter of the likely consequence and impact of the policy.

The undermentioned points show a forward looking attack:aˆ? A statement of intended results is prepared at an early phaseaˆ? Contingency or scenario planningaˆ? Taking into history the Government ‘s long term schemeaˆ? Use of DTI ‘s Foresight programme and/or other prediction workOUTWARD LookThe policy-making procedure takes history of act uponing factors in the national, European and international state of affairs ; pull on experience in other states ; considers how policy will be communicated with the populace. The undermentioned points demonstrate an outward looking attack:aˆ? Makes usage of OECD, EU mechanisms etcaˆ? Looks at how other states dealt with the issueaˆ? Recognises regional fluctuation within Englandaˆ? Communications/presentation scheme prepared and implementedINNOVATIVE, FLEXIBLE AND CREATIVEThe policy-making procedure is flexible and advanced, oppugning established ways of covering with things, promoting new and originative thoughts ; and where appropriate, doing established ways work better. Wherever possible, the procedure is unfastened to remarks and suggestions of others. Hazards are identified and actively managed. The undermentioned points demonstrate an advanced, flexible and originative attack:aˆ? Uses options to the usual ways of working ( brainstorming Sessionss etc )aˆ? Defines success in footings of results already identifiedaˆ? Consciously buttockss and manages riskaˆ? Takes stairss to make direction constructions which promote new thoughts and effectual squad workingaˆ? Brings in people from outside into policy squadEVIDENCE-BASEDThe advice and determinations of policy shapers are based upon the best available grounds from a broad scope of beginnings ; all cardinal stakeholders are involved at an early phase and throughout the policy ‘s development. All relevant grounds, including that from specializers, is available in an accessible and meaningful signifier to policy shapers. Key points of an grounds based attack to policy-making include:aˆ? Reviews bing researchaˆ? Commissions new researchaˆ? Consults relevant experts and/or used internal and external advisersaˆ? Considers a scope of decently costed and appraised optionsINCLUSIVEThe policy-making procedure takes history of the impact on and/or meets the demands of all people straight or indirectly affected by the policy ; and involves cardinal stakeholders straight.

An inclusive attack may include the undermentioned facets:aˆ? Consults those responsible for service delivery/implementationaˆ? Consults those at the having terminal or otherwise affected by the policyaˆ? Carries out an impact appraisalaˆ? Seeks feedback on policy from receivers and front line JesussJOINED UPThe procedure takes a holistic position ; looking beyond institutional boundaries to the authorities ‘s strategic aims and seeks to set up the ethical, moral and legal base for policy. There is consideration of the appropriate direction and organizational constructions needed to present cross-cutting aims. The undermentioned points show a joined-up attack to policy-making:aˆ? Cross cutting aims clearly defined at the beginningaˆ? Joint working agreements with other sections clearly defined and good understoodaˆ? Barriers to effectual joined up clearly identified with a scheme to get the better of themaˆ? Implementation considered portion of the policy devising procedureReappraisalExisting/established policy is invariably reviewed to guarantee it is truly covering with jobs it was designed to work out, taking history of associated effects elsewhere. Aspects of a reexamining attack to policy-making include:aˆ? Ongoing reappraisal programme in topographic point with a scope of meaningful public presentation stepsaˆ? Mechanisms to let service Jesuss /customers to supply feedback direct to policy shapers set upaˆ? Redundant or neglecting policies scrappedEvaluationSystematic rating of the effectivity of policy is built into the policy devising procedure. Approaches to policy devising that show a committedness to rating include:aˆ? Clearly defined intent for the rating set at beginningaˆ? Success standards definedaˆ? Means of rating built into the policy doing procedure from the beginningaˆ? Use of pilots to act upon concluding resultsLEARNS LESSONSLearns from experience of what works and what does non. A learning attack to policy development includes the undermentioned facets:aˆ? Information on lessons learned and good pattern disseminatedaˆ? Account available of what was done by policy-makers as a consequence of lessons learnedaˆ? Clear differentiation drawn between failure of the policy to impact on the job it was intended to decide and managerial/operational failures of execution.

Conservative – Thatcher Era

It can be said that features of the Labour and Conservative party remain changeless, wherein there is a greater focal point for Conservative authorities to cut down State dependence and a civilization in the position of Thatcherism ‘I think we have gone through a period when excessively many kids and people have been given to understand “ I have a job, it is the Government ‘s occupation to get by with it! ” or “ I have a job, I will travel and acquire a grant to get by with it! ” “ I am homeless, the Government must house me! ” and so they are projecting their jobs on society and who is society? There is no such thing! There are single work forces and adult females and there are households and no authorities can make anything except through people and people look to themselves foremost.

It is our responsibility to look after ourselves and so besides to assist look after our neighbor and life is a mutual concern and people have got the entitlements excessively much in head without the duties. ‘ ( ^A ” Interview for Woman ‘s Own ( “ no such thing as society ” ) with journalist Douglas Keay ” . Margaret Thatcher Foundation. 23A September 1987. Retrieved 10A April 2007. )This political orientation is represented with policy alterations such as the debut of canvass revenue enhancement in which everyone was expected to lend the same sum of revenue enhancement regardless of income or wealth and is seen as a poorness making policy. It could be said that the epoch of Tory power between 1979 and 1997 was a period when actions were being implemented to cover with the ‘crisis ‘ of public assistance within the UK. It had been suggested that between 1951 and 1979, degrees of contention over anti-poverty policies were, arguably, non peculiarly high.

Conservative ideologues nevertheless had much to state about the instance for conveying market conditions more efficaciously to bear on distribution of societal services, but merely in the lodging field had Conservative authoritiess taken stairss that represented major responses to this point of view. Labour disappointed many of its protagonists, who closely identified the party with the promotion of the Welfare State. A sequence of economic crises limited the money available for new anti-poverty constabularies. Yet both parties, even before the Thatcher authorities came into power had well advanced public outgo peculiarly on societal policies, to the point where some economic experts argued that this sort of outgo had become inflationary force, restricting the range for new wealth making private investing.

This is a position politicians began to take earnestly by the seventiess, with the most astonishing growing in seen in public employment and societal security transportation payments.Although it is alluring to impute the alteration in clime for societal policy in the UK to the Conservative led authorities of 1979, the alterations had been bit by bit emerging before that day of the month, and those alterations were rooted every bit much in economic sciences as in political orientation. Keynesian economic direction techniques affecting use of degrees of authorities outgo and revenue enhancement were employed to seek to retain full employment without rising prices. This nevertheless was non possible with monetarists ‘ school of idea being that the authorities must command the money supply and allow economic forces bring the system under control ( Friedman, 1962, 1977 ) . The authorities at the clip when Thatcher took office were doubtless hostile to province societal policy. This ill will was rooted in a committedness to denationalization, the kerb of public services and assailing trade brotherhoods.

The authorities was untroubled by the grounds that such an attack was bring forthing increased poorness. Despite the purposes to command societal policy outgo, it however grew as a whole, with disbursement on the National Health Services and Welfare continually increasing. See Glennerster and Hills ( 1998 ) for a elaborate analysis of those tendencies.

It was during that epoch that they changed auxiliary benefit whichA was a means-tested benefit in the United Kingdom, paid to people on low incomes, whether or non they were classed as unemployed such as pensionaries, the ill and single-parents. Introduced in November 1966, it replaced the earlier system of discretional National Assistance payments and was intended to ‘top-up ‘ other benefits, hence its name. It was paid hebdomadally by theA DHSS, throughA giroA checks andA order books, or biweekly by the Unemployment Benefit Office by giro and cashed at localA station offices. This was later abolished and replaced by income support and lodging benefit by the Thatcher authorities and besides signalled the alteration for the proviso of sickness absence for the first 28 hebdomads from National Insurance to a Statutory Sick Pay strategy run by employers.The 1986 Social Security Act extended the range for undertaking out from the SERP ( State Earnings Related Pension Scheme ) which is now the basic province pension leting the growing of private pension programs. The household income addendum was replaced by household recognition which went onto evolve into revenue enhancement credits under the New Labour authorities.

Under the Thatcher authorities was a entire restructure of the benefits system, which included, along the 1s mentioned antecedently that alteration of unemployment benefit to occupation searchers allowance to underscore the behavior required and do allowance tested agencies after the first six months.Other alterations made by the authorities at that clip included the transmutation of the invalidness benefit to incapacity benefit, taking to coerce all but badly handicapped, below pension age, to go occupation searchers. One of the most complex pieces of statute law was the province support for individual parent households, which was designed to procure increased parts from ‘absent ‘ parents ( usually male parents ) through the Child Support Act of 1991.


The Blair authorities when it came to Welfare declared themselves as the authorities for Welfare Reform with a committedness to a stable public outgo programme, but the inclination of societal security costs to lift irrespective of policy alteration which is a job besides faced by the Thatcher authorities, which in bend limited New labor ‘s room to maneuver. Labour saw the solution to this quandary by increasing employment ; the stimulation of labour-market engagement by individual parents and the handicapped every bit good as the unemployed is cardinal to their societal security policy scheme This is seen trough the debut of working revenue enhancement recognition and their ‘welfare to work ‘ programmes for immature people under 25.The most important purpose of New Labour was to eliminate child poorness and this was done with strategies such as child revenue enhancement recognition, but perchance the biggest alteration introduced to undertake poorness was the National Minimum pay, which was exceeding and ensured that everyone was entitled to a basic wage regardless of occupation function and prevented employers from working employees, there has now nevertheless been greater statement for the debut of a life pay, which is something that the present labor party actively support, with current resistance leader Ed Milliband and former Mayor of London Ken Livingstone protagonists of a national life pay.It is deserving retrieving that when Tony Blair came to power in 1997, he claimed that we had ‘reached the bounds of the populace ‘s willingness merely to fund an unreformed public assistance system through of all time higher revenue enhancements and disbursement. ‘ Urgent public assistance reforms, he said, would ‘cut the measures of societal failure ‘ , let go ofing money for schools and infirmaries.

Welfare Reform 2012 – The Policy Agenda

The chief elements of the public assistance reform act areThe debut of Universal Credit to supply a individual streamlined payment that will better work inducementsA stronger attack to cut downing fraud and mistake with tougher punishments for the most serious offensesA new claimant committedness demoing clearly what is expected of claimants while giving protection to those with the greatest demandsReforms to Disability Living Allowance, through the debut of the Personal Independence Payment to run into the demands of handicapped people todayMaking a fairer attack to Housing Benefit to convey stableness to the market and better inducements to workDriving out maltreatment of the Social Fund system by giving greater power to local governmentsReforming Employment and Support Allowance to do the benefit fairer and to guarantee that aid goes to those with the greatest demandChanges to back up a new system of kid support which puts the involvement of the kid foremost.This changes signal perchance the hugest shingle up to the public assistance act in one fell slide, it can be argued nevertheless that New Labour were already implementing alterations to cut down the public assistance measure, but non in a manner as direct as the alliance authorities, with one of the chief focal point being to cut down poorness and eliminate kid poorness – which is something that this essay will touch on farther on in the essay.

Britain now spendsA 7.2 per cent of GDP on it ‘s public assistance system, and the costs of back uping the, purportedly, destitute continue to rise.A As the Whitehall imperium grows, submerging the baronial purposes of public assistance in ruddy tape, so excessively do the figure who chose to mistreat the system.

the bend against public assistance is unprecedented. In old times of asceticism, public attitudes have ever remained unusually generous.

Even in the straitened late Seventiess, for illustration, seven out of 10 people told poll takers they would wish to see higher revenue enhancements to pay for higher societal disbursement. The truth is that we have reached a water parting.To look after the weak is the first responsibility of any nice authorities ; to abandon them would be conscienceless.Embarrassingly, Britain now has the highest proportion of working-age people on disablement benefit in the developed universe. And while merely 3aˆ‰aˆ‰per cent of Nipponese people and 5aˆ‰aˆ‰per cent of Americans live in familieswhere no 1 works, the figure in Britain is 13aˆ‰aˆ‰per cent.AThe people who truly lose from this, by the way, are those who are truly disabled. They deserve unbounded public understanding ; alternatively, thanks to the maltreatment of the system, they are excessively frequently treated with agnosticism.

But behind all this lies a deeper issue. Beveridge designed the public assistance province for a tightly knit, profoundly loyal and overpoweringly propertyless society, dominated by the atomic household.Though 1000000s of people had grown up in intense poorness, they were steeped in a civilization of working-class reputability and driven by an about Victorian work ethic. In the universe of the narrow patio back streets, deliberate idling would hold been virtually unthinkable.It could be said that the public assistance reform might non needfully be a alteration in way for anti-poverty policies, but a policy implemented to alter the head set of a state that has transformed from one where people thought about what they could lend towards their ain state particularly at a clip of war, to a state where certain persons, bearing in head a little minority of people believe they deserve more from the province without holding to gain it.The cardinal factors of public assistance reform is cosmopolitan recognition which will be an all across-the-board payment that incorporates huge bulk of out-of-work and lodging benefits that families can have.

Poverty – Relative and Absolute

Child poorness – Outstanding decrease mark. Major revenue enhancement benefit reforms profiting low-income households with kids.

Working-age poorness – Policy focal point on worklessness, non poorness in itself. Policies aimed at employment and income at work.Employment – Clearest initial precedence.

Action through New Deals and ‘active ‘ policy towards unemployed.Political engagement – Some facets of constitutional reform and parts of Social Exclusion Unit ( SEU ) docket for vicinity reclamation. Engagement demands embedded in about all policy countries. Targets for volunteering and assurance in establishments.Poor vicinities – Major focal point of SEU, with ambitious overall mark.

Policies both area-based and for mainstream services.Children and early old ages – Has moved up the docket with reappraisals in 1998 and 2004. Large addition in resources.Older people – services and long-run incomes – Royal Commission on Long Term Care – but divided study and responses in England and Scotland. State Second Pension and Pension Credit reforms.

The devising of Anti-Poverty Policies

Anti poorness policies -Tax credits ( Child and working revenue enhancement credits ) ,Child benefit,lodging benefit,council revenue enhancement benefit,income based JSA and ESA ( Job searchers allowance and Employment Support Allowance ) ,Income Support,Universal CreditAnti-poverty policy doing – Joseph Rowntree FoundationPrior to the Welfare Reform move the focal point of policies was that the province aid its citizens from the cradle to the grave with public assistance support – constabularies introduced throughout which coincided with the debut of the national wellness service has been the pillar and way of a batch of anti-poverty constabularies that have been introduced in which the province takes attention of those unable to take attention of themselves. Countless policies have been introduced in that clip that have provided aid to the aged, handicapped, adult females, kids, unemployed and those with long-run illness are some of the groups that polices introduce since Beveridge ‘s study in 1942 have focused on helping and assisting. Although it ‘s non a surprise that of all time since the alliance came into authorities, bearing in head that the party is dominated by the Tories as the bulk party, there manifesto of all time since 1979 and the epoch of Thatcherism has ever been to cut down the function of the province and give persons greater power and duty over their ain lives.The inquiry has to whether the public assistance reform act 2012 has signalled a alteration in way for anti-poverty policies is non a consecutive forward inquiry, with a consecutive forward reply, it can be suggested that it is of import to look at the alterations that have been taking topographic point, with the public assistance measure gyrating out of control, which was something noticed by New Labour when they came into power.


The public assistance reform act can be seen as alteration in way from the description of a ‘nanny province ‘ into province that ‘helps those who want to assist themselves ‘