Plato, Machiavelli Essay

Machiavelli says the prince merely has to look good. non be good. Plato insists that looking is bad. being is good. Nicolo Machiavelli is known as being an realist who accepted that fact that worlds are barbarous. selfish. and volatile while Plato was an dreamer who believed people could be ruled by a philosopher male monarch who ruled over the warriors and shopkeepers of his ideal democracy with reason. In his position the philosopher-king was in charge of doing the province a “utopia” in that everyone had his/her topographic point and all worked together for the common good of the province.

Machiavelli said that this was a foolish thought. Machiavelli doctrine of authorities was centered on the swayer. He believed the male monarch. or tyrant. had the right to make whatever was necessary for his ain addition. or whatever the sovereign considered the “good of the state” which he called Virtu’ . Machiavelli believed the lone intent for a swayer was to do war. and protect its citizens from onslaughts by other provinces. He advocated the slaughter of surrendered generals in order to oppress hopes of revolution – even apologizing that it was deserving the hazard of revolution should it anger the people.

Machiavelli believed a swayer should be immoral utilizing misrepresentation and semblance for power and ne’er leting the people to cognize the “real” him In Machiavelli’s clip. as it is today. the States whole ground for being was to function the citizens. The swayer. therefore. is justified in making whatever is necessary to keep the state or province. even if it is unfair. In Plato’s clip. adult male served the province. Harmonizing to the viewed that moralss and political relations are the same. or at least co-terminous. There was no differentiation between private life and public life. as there is today.

We Will Write a Custom Essay Specifically
For You For Only $13.90/page!

order now

Plato argues a swayer can ne’er be unfair. Plato argues against this type of swayer. who regulations entirely by might. Plato attempts to turn out that it is ever better to be merely than unfair. claiming that there is a strong connexion between justness. personal felicity and the well being of the province. Machiavelli underlines the fact that moral rules are non needfully connected with the efficiency of the act of opinion. If the rules of morality and justness demand to be broken in for the province to be comfortable. than this is how things should be done.

In the terminal. Plato and Machiavelli lived really different lives. lending to their differing ideas on the universe. Plato grew up in the upper blue category but was “adopted” by Socrates. As he followed Socrates. he learned all he would necessitate for his ulterior life as a philosopher when he basically wandered around Greece without wage. In this manner he was untouched by wealth’s corruptness. Machiavelli. on the other manus. grew up in a affluent Italian place and lived good supplied for by his frequenters. The wealth that he was accustomed to was the chief cause for his doctrine centered around personal addition.


I'm Mack!

Would you like to get a custom essay? How about receiving a customized one?

Check it out