This essay will measure the current societal policy responses to the societal issue of domestic force. Domestic force is a multi-faceted issue impacting the culprit, the subsister and their households. This means that many bureaus may necessitate to be involved. Domestic force is prevailing within all strata of society, rich and hapless, with no respect for faith, ethnicity or geographical location, and histories for 15 per centum of violent offenses ( Home Office, 2009 ) . It is estimated that domestic force cost the state ?23 billion per twelvemonth ( Women ‘s Aid, 2007d ) .
It is non merely committed by work forces against adult females but by adult females on work forces and within same sex relationships. However as the bulk of incidents are perpetrated by work forces against adult females – with a greater hazard of repetition offending and worse badness of force experienced – this essay will concentrate on this facet.To to the full understand this issue this essay will research the historical roots of domestic force, looking at how attitudes may hold originated, what challenges have caused them to alter and what farther alterations may be necessary.
It will so research alterations in the statute law and how this affects the constabulary ‘s powers and their usage of them. It will so travel on to research condemnable justness responses, such as Specialist Domestic Violence Courts and Integrated Domestic Abuse Programmes, measuring their efficaciousness. It will so analyze the societal policy responses impacting the subsisters of domestic maltreatment, such as the creative activity of constabulary Domestic Violence Units, sanctuary strategies, lodging, support services, and kid protection. It will besides look at methods used to place possible domestic force victims. It will demo that the current accent on condemnable justness responses is deviating resources off from frontline adult females ‘s services, which can disproportionately impact adult females from Black and cultural minority communities.Historically there has been no construct of domestic force. Harmonizing to Carlson Brown ( 1994 ) this is because of the patriarchal society that existed, and to some extent still exists, which was sanctioned by spiritual texts.
It was the belief was that adult females and kids were the belongings of the adult male and it was his responsibility to train them as he saw tantrum. This political orientation was merely challenged in recent decennaries by the rise of feminism. The debut of the preventive pill in the nineteen-sixties gave adult females the freedom of pick over their reproduction, and hence other countries of their lives. However, at first merely physical maltreatment was considered domestic force but in the nineteen-eighties sexual maltreatment began to be considered as domestic force. In malice of this re-evaluation matrimonial colza was non considered a offense until 1991 in England and Wales ( Rape Crisis, 2008 ) . In recent times the definition of domestic force has been widened to the current authorities definition:’Any incident of endangering behavior, force or maltreatment ( psychological, physical, sexual, fiscal or emotional ) between grownups who are or have been intimate spouses or household members, irrespective of gender or gender ‘ ( Home Office, 2009 ) .
This definition therefore screens less traditional household agreements and patterns from different civilizations, such as “ honour-based ” force, forced matrimonies and female venereal mutilation. This means that domestic force is non classified as a individual offense but several different related offenses, such as common assault, colza, false imprisonment and attempted slaying. However there are still some incidents, such as psychological and emotional maltreatment, which whilst extremely upsetting to the subsisters are non prosecutable offenses. This definition concentrates on grownups and therefore disregards those aged under 18, nevertheless a programme on childs in unafraid kids ‘s places revealed that misss every bit immature as 10 old ages old were sing physical maltreatment at the custodies of their intimate spouses ( BBC Radio 4, 20 April 2009 ) . Therefore there exists yet more of the population who ‘s demand for protection and support require addressing.One of the chief ways for authorities to turn to the issue of domestic force is through statute law.
The Domestic Violence, Crime and Victims Act 2004 was introduced to undertake the issue of domestic force in a battalion of ways. The act ‘s purpose was to give greater power to the constabulary and tribunals when covering with the culprits of domestic force whilst supplying increased protection to the subsisters ( Home Office, 2008a ) . One of the ways of increasing constabulary powers was to do common assault an arrestable offense, this can let the subsister a period of contemplation to assist them make up one’s mind whether they wish to go on with prosecution or non. This continues moves, started in the nineteen-eighties, off from the constabulary seeking to accommodate the parties involved towards ‘zero tolerance ‘ of domestic force. However this may take to less incidents being reported as the subsister may non wish to criminalize her spouse, particularly if he is the male parent of her kids. This is even more applicable within the Black and cultural minority communities who, due to frights over racialist favoritism, are less likely to look to the constabulary for assistance ( Women ‘s Aid, 2007a ) .A farther alteration in constabulary power was to do the breach of non-molestation orders an arrestable offense, which carries a prison sentence of up to five old ages. The nature of non-molestation orders was besides changed to recognize the demands of same sex twosomes and non-cohabiting twosomes for the same protection afforded heterosexual cohabiting twosomes.
It is hoped that these steps will cut down the figure of breaches of these orders, and hence afford greater protection to subsisters, due to the greater countenances now attached. This alteration besides means that the subsister is a informant in a condemnable affair and no longer responsible for taking action over the prosecution nor burdened with the costs of that prosecution. However this can intend that the Crown Prosecution Service may prosecute instances that the subsister may wish dropped, which could take to her being disempowered and experiencing non in control one time once more ( Women ‘s Aid, 2007a ) . Besides in doing breach of non-molestation orders a condemnable affair this moved them from closed household tribunals, where merely the parties involved were in Chamberss, to condemnable tribunals, which allows both imperativeness and public audience, although press limitation can be put in topographic point to protect the individuality of informants in these instances ( Women ‘s Aid, 2007a ) .Another authorities response was to make Specialist Domestic Violence Courts ( SDVCs ) .
The SDVC programme started in 2006 with an initial 23 SDVCs, more have been accredited each subsequent twelvemonth to give the current sum of one-hundred-and-five. Harmonizing to the Home Office ( 2006 ) the SDVC programme signifiers portion of a multi-agency response to domestic force, which is intended to supply greater safety for the subsisters and name culprits to account through assorted agencies of intercession. Some of the steps used in SDVCs include utilizing specially trained Judgess, fast racking of domestic force instances and entree to Independent Domestic Violence Advisors ( IDVAs ) to supply specialist support ( Women ‘s Aid, 2008a ) . In a Home Office ( 2008b ) reappraisal of the original 23 SDVCs it was found that there was a higher per centum of apprehensions made for domestic force offenses and there was a higher per centum of successful prosecutions when compared with non-SDVCs within the same country. There were high degrees of support provided by the IDVAs both within and outside the condemnable justness system which increased subsister safety and satisfaction.
These consequences are believed to better public assurance in the condemnable justness system. However where SDVCs were found to hold a lower per centum of successful prosecutions it was found that there was a higher per centum of Black and cultural minority suspects. This shows that there are still issues to be dealt with when covering with instances from these communities. Women ‘s Aid ( 2008a ) besides calls into inquiry the authorities accent on utilizing the condemnable justness system to undertake domestic force issues as this means that merely those who report an incident, about 24 per centum of subsisters, have entree to this specialized aid. This means that a big proportion of subsisters are without support or accessing other domestic force support services that are missing political and fiscal support as a consequence.Another authorities enterprise designed to cut down incidents of domestic force is the Integrated Domestic Abuse Programme ( IDAP ) . This is a programme for up to 27 hebdomad for the culprits of domestic force to turn to their offending behavior. The culprit must hold a Community Rehabilitation Order ( CRO ) or a Community Punishment and Rehabilitation Order ( CPRO ) with conditions to go to.
Its purpose is to dispute the culprit ‘s beliefs and attitudes towards domestic force therefore cut downing the hazard of reoffending. It besides offers the spouses of the wrongdoers a support group ( Home Office, 2004 ) . This programme requires a batch of staff clip and preparation ; it besides requires important disposal. All of which comes from the probation country ‘s budget. Women ‘s Aid ( 2007b ) believes that these programmes can modify offender behavior and supply support subsisters with support. However these programmes are non ever successful in altering the culprit ‘s behavior and can give subsisters unrealistic outlooks that may take to unsound determinations around their ain safety. They may besides pretermit back uping the subsister to concentrate on their function coverage on the culprit ‘s behavior. Besides studies have shown that due to budget restraints there are long waiting lists of up to two old ages for these programmes.
This has lead to, in 2007, over four 1000 orders by the tribunal being handed down whilst merely one 1000 eight hundred being completed, with some instances of repetition piquing whist waiting for a topographic point on a programme ( Doward, 2008 ) .A authorities survey shows that there is a strong nexus between domestic force and intoxicant maltreatment with 62 per centum of offenses affecting intoxicant and 48 per centum of the sample group being alcohol dependent ( Gilchrist et al, 2003 ) . Therefore another attack to undertaking domestic force is telling culprits with intoxicant jobs to go to intervention programmes. However alcohol maltreatment is non a cause of domestic force but it is frequently used as an alibi for violent behavior. In fact, harmonizing to Women ‘s Aid ( 2005a ) handling the culprits alcohol or drug issues can take to an addition in force particularly during the backdown period.
Therefore this must be tackled holistically turn toing both the piquing behavior and the drug and/or intoxicant job whilst guaranting the subsister ‘s safety and that of her kids, if any.Not all societal policy responses deal with the culprits of domestic force. Many focal point on the subsisters and their households. One of the chief responses was to make dedicated Domestic Violence Units ( DVUs ) with specializer trained officers.
The overruling purpose of these units is to protect subsisters and their households and guarantee that domestic maltreatment is treated merely every bit earnestly as any other violent offense. These units specifically try to undertake the involuntariness of subsisters to describe incidents of domestic force due to the belief that the constabulary will non take them earnestly or will be unable to assist ( Women ‘s Aid, 2008b ) . This is peculiarly the instance with adult females from the Black and cultural minority community who can confront stigmatism from their communities and may besides fear institutional racism from the constabulary. Those subsisters with insecure in-migration position may besides fear exile should they go forth their spouse and study domestic force ( Women ‘s Aid, 2009c ) . To help subsisters DVUs can mention them onto other support services, which can rede them about their rights, and liaise with the Crown Prosecution Service ( CPS ) over the prosecution of domestic force.To assist protect subsisters from repetition exploitation DVUs can mention them to the Sanctuary Scheme which allows the subsister to remain within their ain place, and avoid turbulences and farther hurt, every bit long as the culprit is no longer populating with them. It does this by supplying excess security steps such as ‘sanctuary suites ‘ where the subsister can stay safe from the culprit whilst waiting for the constabulary to get.
However non all place are suited for this strategy due to their building or location and non all subsisters would wish to stay in their ain place ( Communities and Local Government, 2006 ) . In these instances DVUs can mention the subsister to a safety or the local authorization ‘s homelessness unit.Domestic force is one of the chief causes of homelessness in adult females ( Rights of Women, 2007 ) and is peculiarly debatable as there may be several issues perplexing the affair. Women ‘s safeties provide safe adjustment whether or non the adult female has reported domestic force to the constabulary. However accessing a safety is peculiarly hard as there is limited proviso with merely 373 adult females ‘s safeties in the whole state ( Coy et al, 2009 ) . Besides non all safeties can suit big households, some topographic point limitations on the upper ages of male kids, asking the dividing up of already hard-pressed households. Some safeties are unable to suit those with physical disablements or those with mental wellness and/or substance maltreatment issues.
There are some safeties that specialise in run intoing the demands of the Black and cultural minority groups but demand far outstrips supply ( Hall and Whyte, 2003 ) . When a suited topographic point in a safety is non available the local authorization may hold a responsibility to re-house subsisters of domestic force. There are certain standards that must be met for the local authorization to re-house subsisters: that they have non made themselves deliberately homeless ; they are in precedence need ; they are eligible ; and they have a local connexion.
However it is up to the local authorization to measure whether the subsister is in precedence demand. In some countries this means that those without kids are non considered to be in precedence need therefore know aparting against those who for whatever ground do non hold kids. A farther complication is that many subsisters are financially dependent upon their maltreater, although there aid for some is available through the benefits system non all are cognizant of this, particularly those whose chief linguistic communication is non English ( Dhillon-Kashyap, 1994 ) and may hold been kept unaware of this by their maltreater as a agency of control. Those capable to immigration control with ‘no resort to public financess ‘ would non be able to pay for a refuge topographic point or other adjustment through lodging benefit, as many do, but at that place other signifiers of support sometimes available for safeties, but this is limited due to funding restraints ( Women ‘s Aid, 2007c ) .DVUs can besides mention subsisters to Women ‘s Aid, which is a charity that provides specialist support and advice. However they do non restrict themselves to those who have reported domestic force, any adult female enduring from domestic force can entree them.
Women ‘s Aid can assist subsisters entree other signifiers of aid such as assisting kids affected by populating with domestic force or sing maltreatment themselves, lodging, benefits, mental wellness services and substance maltreatment intervention. Due to funding restraints there are waiting lists for this critical support. One of the most of import facets of Women ‘s Aid ‘s work is their counselling service, as one time a subsister has left their maltreater one of the chief indexs that they may return is whether they attribute of the duty for the maltreatment to themselves or the maltreater ( Worth and Tiggemann, 1996 ) . The guidance offered examines this. Another index of return is the attitude of their household towards their actions ( Worth and Tiggemann, 1996 ) , this is peculiarly pertinent for adult females from Black and cultural minority communities who may confront animadversion from their household and community. Women ‘s Aid besides supports those who wish to stay populating with their violent spouses, assisting them to make so in the safest manner possible. Women ‘s Aid besides works with other bureaus stand foring its service users ‘ demands and experiences.Childs who live in a place where domestic force is taking topographic point can be really severely affected and may see behavioral jobs ( McFarlane et al, 2003 ) .
Although a kid may non witness domestic force they may be cognizant of it taking topographic point: they may hear it ; or witness the ensuing hurts. If they do witness domestic force they may acquire injured seeking to step in. Research has shown that between 30 and 66 per centum of kids that live in a place where domestic force is taking topographic point besides face abuse themselves ( Women ‘s Aid, 2009b ) . In all of these instances it is more than probably that the kid will necessitate reding to cover with the injury experienced. Despite all this an opprobrious parent can still use through the tribunals to hold contact with their kid. It is normally felt that it is in the best involvements of the kid to hold contact with both parents. When there is the hazard of abduction of farther maltreatment of the kid an rating by an officer from the Children and Family Courts ‘ Advisory and Support Service ( CAFCASS ) can be made to determine whether contact is advisable and is so what nature it should take. Contact may go on in a contact Centre.
However these Centres are normally staffed by voluntaries and may non be able to supply the uninterrupted supervising necessary ( Women ‘s Aid, 2009d ) . If the female parent does non follow with the contact order because of frights for the kid ‘s or her ain safety she will be in disdain of tribunal and can confront countenances such as mulcts, backdown of legal assistance, transportation of abode and even imprisonment.Woman ‘s Aid may besides necessitate to mention their service users to drug and intoxicant services because adult females enduring domestic force are ‘fifteen times more likely to misapply intoxicant ‘ and those ‘who report domestic maltreatment are nine times more likely to misapply drugs ‘ than adult females in the general population ( Women ‘s Aid, 2009a ) . This may be because they use drugs and intoxicant as a get bying mechanism or their maltreater has used drugs and intoxicant as a agency of control ( Finney, 2004 ) .
Whatever the grounds this farther complicates affairs for the subsister. As mentioned earlier this can do it more hard for a subsister to acquire a topographic point in a safety. Besides it can be a hinderance in describing domestic force, as the subsister may fear being stigmatised as an alky or a drug nut ( Women ‘s Aid, 2009a ) . If the subsister wishes to undertake their substance issues this can be hard as support for intervention is restricted and many intervention services are male-orientated and may hold assorted groups where she may non experience able to discourse those issues impacting her ( Women ‘s Aid, 2009a ) .Another governmental response is trying to place possible subsisters of domestic force. As 30 per centum of domestic force starts during gestation and ‘domestic force is the premier cause of abortion or spontaneous abortion, and maternal decease during childbearing ‘ ( Woman ‘s Aid, 2005b ) the authorities has set up an prenatal showing policy to place those at hazard. This involves supplying specialised preparation for accoucheuses and other health care suppliers to assist them promote pregnant adult females sing domestic force to unwrap this, but it must be done in a safe manner and this can be hard with the, normally, commanding nature of the culprit.
However it has been found that non all health care suppliers routinely question all patients as they believed that they were able to place those who were sing domestic maltreatment and would merely oppugn those who they felt may be sing domestic force ( Jeanjot et al, 2008 ) . Besides midwives reported concerns about accessing support for themselves and co-workers as about 19 per centum had reported sing domestic force themselves ( Barnet, 2005 ) .The Corston Report found that a disproportional figure of female captives, when compared to the general population, had suffered domestic force ( Corston, 2007 ) . This may be for a assortment of grounds: their maltreater forced them to perpetrate offenses ; they committed offenses to travel to prison and get away the maltreatment they faced ; or they committed the offenses to back up their drug and/or intoxicant dependence. Whatever the grounds the Corston Report recommended that there should be compulsory proviso of ‘support for adult females who had been raped, abused or experienced domestic maltreatment ‘ in every regional relocation program ( Corston, 2007 ) . The authorities has accepted this recommendation and it is portion of the Strategic Plan for Reducing Re-Offending, which was launched in spring 2008, and it is hoped that it will assist forestall chronic societal exclusion ( Ministry of Justice, 2007 ) .
However it has non been implemented as yet.It has been shown that domestic force is a extremely complex issue where both the culprits and subsisters tend to hold multiple demands that must be addressed. Legislation has tried to run into the demands of people with different life-style picks. It has besides been shown that the creative activity of Specialist Domestic Violence Courts has had some success in bettering strong belief rates and survivor satisfaction, but still needs to turn to strong belief rates amongst Black and cultural minority suspects. The Integrated Domestic Abuse Programmes have had limited success, due to budgetary restraints doing long holds in culprits being placed on a programme and their offending behavior is hard to alter. Besides any other issues the culprit may hold need to be addressed at the same clip.
It has been demonstrated that the accent on a condemnable justness response neglects the bulk of instances that are non reported to the constabulary. This can disproportionately impact adult females from the Black and cultural minority communities, and those with insecure in-migration position as they are less likely to describe incidents of domestic force for assorted grounds. The accent on the condemnable justness attack to undertaking domestic force besides means that a disproportional sum of support is directed off from other of import steps, such as safeties and other support services, that could be of more aid to the huge bulk who decide non to describe incidents of domestic force or do non desire to prosecute with the condemnable justness system. This support could besides be used for increased staffing at contact Centres to assist guarantee the safety of kids and their female parents, whilst still leting them to interact with their male parents. Or it could be used for female oriented substance abuse intervention. Extra support, which could come from other beginnings such as that allocated for the usage of CCTV, could besides place and assist other subsisters through prenatal showing or within the female prison population.Word Count: 3649
Barnet, C. ( 2005 ) Researching Midwives ‘ attitudes to domestic force testing.
British Journal of Midwifery. Vol.13, No.11, 702-705BBC Radio 4, ( 20 April 2009 ) Inside the Child Prisons.Carlson Brown, J. ( 1994 ) ‘Because of the angels: sexual force and maltreatment.
‘ In Schussler Fiorenza, S. and Copeland, M.S. ( explosive detection systems ) ( 1994 ) Violence Against Women, London: SCM Press.
Communities and Local Government ( 2006 ) Options for Puting Up a Sanctuary Scheme. [ Online ] Available from hypertext transfer protocol: //www.communities.gov.uk/documents/housing/pdf/154295.
pdf. [ Accessed August 2nd 2009 ] .Corston, J. ( 2007 ) The Corston Report: A Review of Women with Particular Vulnerabilities in the Criminal Justice System.
London: Home OfficeCoy, M. , Kelly, L. and Foord, J. ( 2009 ) Map of Gaps 2: the Postcode Lottery of Violence Against Women Support Services. London: End Violence Against Women.Dhillon-Kashyap, P. ( 1994 ) ‘Black adult females and lodging. ‘ In Gilroy, R.
and Woods, R. ( explosive detection systems ) ( 1994 ) Housing Women, London: Routledge.Doward, J. ( 2008 ) Pledge to cut domestic force ‘has failed ‘ The Guardian 17th February.
[ Online ] Available from hypertext transfer protocol: //www.guardian.co.uk/uk/2008/feb/17/ukcrime.justice. [ Accessed August 10th 2009 ] .Finney, A.
( 2004 ) Alcohol and Intimate Partner Violence: Cardinal Findingss from the Research. London: Home OfficeGilchrist, E. , Johnson, R. , Takriti, R. , Weston, S. , Beech, A. and Kebbell, M.
( 2003 ) Domestic Violence Wrongdoers: Features and Offending Related Needs. London: Home Office.Hall, T. and Whyte, D.
( 2003 ) At the borders of proviso: domestic force, patroling and community safety. Policy & A ; Politics Vol. 31, No.1, p3-18.Home Office ( 2009 ) Crime Reduction – Domestic Violence Mini-Site. [ Online ] Available from hypertext transfer protocol: //www.crimereduction.
homeoffice.gov.uk/dv/dv01.htm. [ Accessed August 3rd 2009 ] .Home Office ( 2008a ) Crime Reduction – Domestic Violence: National Plan for Domestic Violence. [ Online ] Available from hypertext transfer protocol: //www.
crimereduction.homeoffice.gov.uk/domesticviolence/domesticviolence51.htm. [ Accessed August 3rd 2009 ] .Home Office ( 2008b ) Specialist Domestic Violence Courts Review 2007-8: Justice with Safety.
[ Online ] Available from hypertext transfer protocol: //www.crimereduction.homeoffice.gov.uk/dv/dv018a.
pdf. [ Accessed August 2nd 2009 ]Home Office ( 2007 ) Crime Reduction – Legislation: The Domestic Violence Crime and Victims Act 2004. [ Online ] Available from hypertext transfer protocol: //www.crimereduction.homeoffice.gov.uk/dv/dv016.
htm. [ Accessed August 3rd 2009 ]Home Office ( 2006 ) Specialist Domestic Violence Court Programme – Resource Manual. [ Online ] Available from hypertext transfer protocol: //www.crimereduction.homeoffice.
gov.uk/domesticviolence/domesticviolence59.pdf. [ Accessed August 1st 2009 ] .Home Office ( 2004 ) Crime Reduction – Domestic Violence.
[ Online ] Available from hypertext transfer protocol: //www.crimereduction.homeoffice.
gov.uk/domesticviolence/domesticviolence43.htm. [ Accessed August 10th 2009 ] .Jeanjot, I. , Barlow, P.
and Rozenberg, S. ( 2008 ) Domestic force during gestation: study of patients and healthcare suppliers. Journal of Women ‘s Health Vol.
17, No. 4, 557-567.McFarlane, J.M. , Groff, J.Y.
, O’Brian, J.A. and Watson, K. ( 2003 ) Behaviours of kids who are exposed and non exposed to adumbrate spouse force: an analysis of 330 Black, White and Latino kids. Pediatricss, Vol. 112, No. 3, 202-207.Ministry of Justice ( 2007 ) The Government ‘s Response to the Report by Baroness Corston of a Review of Women with Particular Vulnerabilities in the Criminal Justice System.
[ Online ] Available from hypertext transfer protocol: //www.justice.gov.uk/publications/docs/corston-review.pdf. [ Accessed August 11th 2009 ] .
Rape Crisis ( 2008 ) Rape in Marriage / Rape by Partner. [ Online ] Available from hypertext transfer protocol: //www.rapecrisis.org.uk/rape/maritalrape.html. [ Accessed August 7th 2009 ] .
Rights of Women ( 2007 ) Domestic Violence, Housing and Homelessness. [ Online ] Available from hypertext transfer protocol: //www.rightsofwomen.org.uk/pdfs/dv_housing_homelessness.pdf.
[ Accessed August 1st 2009 ]Women ‘s Aid ( 2009a ) The Survivor ‘s Handbook – Alcohol and Drugs. [ Online ] Available from hypertext transfer protocol: //www.womensaid.org.
uk/domestic-violence-survivors-handbook.asp? section=000100010008000100360003. [ Accessed August 14th 2009 ] .Women ‘s Aid ( 2009b ) The Survivor ‘s Handbook – Children and Domestic Violence. [ Online ] Available from hypertext transfer protocol: //www.
womensaid.org.uk/domestic-violence-survivors-handbook.asp? section=000100010008000100380001 & A ; sectionTitle=Children+and+domestic+violence. [ Accessed August 13th 2009 ]Women ‘s Aid ( 2009c ) The Survivor ‘s Handbook – Immigration. [ Online ] Available from hypertext transfer protocol: //www.womensaid.
org.uk/domestic-violence-survivors-handbook.asp? section=000100010008000100350002. [ Accessed August 13th 2009 ] .Women ‘s Aid ( 2009d ) The Survivor ‘s Handbook – Making Arrangement for Children After Separation. [ Online ] Available from hypertext transfer protocol: //www.womensaid.
org.uk/domestic-violence-survivors-handbook.asp? section=000100010008000100380002 & A ; sectionTitle=Making+arrangements+for+children+after+separation. [ Accessed August 13th 2009 ]Women ‘s Aid ( 2008a ) Action Plan for Undertaking Domestic Violence 2008-11. [ Online ] Available from hypertext transfer protocol: //www.womensaid.org.uk/domestic-violence-articles.
asp? section=00010001002200430001 & A ; itemid=1548. [ Accessed August 8th 2009 ] .Women ‘s Aid ( 2008b ) Police Responses to Domestic force – Full moon Article. [ Online ] Available from hypertext transfer protocol: //www.womensaid.org.uk/domestic-violence-articles.
asp? section=00010001002200400001 & A ; itemid=1402. [ Accessed August 7th 2009 ] .Women ‘s Aid ( 2007a ) Domestic Violence Crimes and Victims Act 2004: Two New Sections Implemented. [ Online ] Available from hypertext transfer protocol: //www.womensaid.
org.uk/domestic-violence-articles.asp? section=00010001002200070001 & A ; itemid=1039 & A ; itemTitle=Domestic+Violence+Crime+and+Victims+Act+2004 % 3A+two+new+sections+implemented. [ Accessed August 8th 2009 ] .Woman ‘s Aid ( 2007b ) Women ‘s Aid Briefing – Perpetrator Work in the UK. [ Online ] Available from hypertext transfer protocol: //www.womensaid.org.
uk/domestic-violence-articles.asp? section=00010001002200180001 & A ; itemid=1080. [ Accessed August 9th 2009 ] .
Women ‘s Aid ( 2007c ) Support for Survivors: Refuges. [ Online ] Available from hypertext transfer protocol: //womensaid.org.uk/domestic-violence-articles.asp? section=00010001002200210002 & A ; itemid=1301. [ Accessed August 11th 2009 ] .
Women ‘s Aid ( 2007d ) What is Domestic Violence? [ Online ] Available from hypertext transfer protocol: //www.womensaid.org.uk/domestic-violence-articles.asp? section=00010001002200410001 & A ; itemid=1272 & A ; itemTitle=What+is+domestic+violence. [ Accessed July 28th 2009 ] .Women ‘s Aid ( 2005a ) Women ‘s Aid Guidance for people in drug and intoxicant sectors working with adult females sing domestic maltreatment.
[ Online ] Available from hypertext transfer protocol: //womensaid.org.uk/domestic-violence-articles.asp? itemid=956 & A ; itemTitle=Women % 27s+Aid+Guidance+for+people+in+drug+and+alcohol+sectors+working+with+women+experiencing+domestic+abuse & A ; section=00010001002200280001 & A ; sectionTitle=Articles % 3A+drugs+and+alcohol. [ Accessed August 12th 2009 ] .
Women ‘s Aid ( 2005b ) Statistics – Pregnancy and Domestic Violence. [ Online ] Available from hypertext transfer protocol: //www.womensaid.org.
uk/domestic-violence-articles.asp? section=00010001002200010001 & A ; itemid=822. [ Accessed August 8th 2009 ] .
Worth, N. and Tiggermann, M. ( 1996 ) Forecasters of adult females ‘s return to violent spouses. Australian Journal of Social Issues, Vol. 13, No. 4, p376-391.