The belief that there are descriptive and prescriptive age norms concerning adults during their developmental shift involves the concept of the social clock. The social clock hinges on its description of society’s expectations where time to get married and have children at the same time attaining more of life’s burdens. For example, the traditional or what has been considered as the perception of women who have not yet entered into matrimony as individuals who are negatively appraised during their middle adulthood stage in contrast to the young adults.
Social clock has something to do with an expectation that a person must somehow behave or conduct him/herself according to established developmental milestones or else, risk the consequences that may happen because the individual has allowed it to slip through ( Altenbernd, 2004).
The concept is not unknown to anyone today, this despite the fact that many among Americans have grown to know in informal set-ups that the social clock exists and must be followed.
In the Bible, there are direct references when the Scriptures contradicted this traditional system. Although the Bible also showed how patriarchs like Abraham and his wife Sarah, had observed (in one instance, in panic) that both are past their childbearing stage and laughed (especially Sarah) when the angel did say that they will have their son born soon. In Genesis 17: 11, it says that “Now Abraham and Sarah were old, well advanced in age; and Sarah had passed the age of childbearing (NKJV).”
My opinion and belief is that when a person has the same God as that of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob, there is no confinement to the so-called social clocks. In the case of Sarah and Abraham, they were indeed past the age to bear children, and the book of Genesis showed that God is who He is, and precisely He can do with anything; He made Sarah deliver a baby boy just as He told them.