In all literature. and more specifically in essays or short narratives there are a big figure of literally elements used. The six most consistent 1s are characters. secret plan.
puting. symbols. point-of-view. and purpose. All of these together combine to make a huge figure of novels. essays. and short narratives that we all know today. Some of the best well-known narratives are Hills like White Elephants by Hemmingway.
Why we Crave Horror Movies by King. The Yellow Wallpaper by Gilman. and Occurrence at Owl Creek Bridge by Bierce. All of these narratives have a few things in common. and that is the six literally elements mentioned before. Like the other pieces mentioned. The Cask of Amontillado by Edgar Allen Poe. besides contains these literally elements.
To get down. The Cask of Amontillado is a really dark and cryptic narrative of Montresor and his ‘Friend’ Fortunato. Throughout the narrative. it is told in first individual so we don’t cognize the name of the storyteller ( Montresor ) until the terminal. In the beginning. the readers are told that in some signifier Fortunato has hurt Montresor. and he now wants retaliation.
Unfortunately. we are ne’er told what was done to upset Montresor. When the existent narrative Begins. we learn that Fortunato is really intoxicated and has a failing for intoxicant. Knowing this. Montresor lures and tempts Fortunato to come with him to where he purportedly keeps his really rare brandy called Amontillado. The topographic point that he takes him to go on to be a catacomb.
or in other words an belowground graveyard which happens to belong to the Montresor household. They proceed on a long through the catacomb. and go on to travel deeper and deeper within it. Throughout the full walk. Fortunato continues to imbibe and go even more intoxicated so he was at the start of the reading. Finally. they get deep plenty and Fortunato is trapped within the walls of the catacomb.
Montresor chains him to the wall so he can non get away. and puts bricks over the hole so he can’t flight. In the terminal. he leaves him at that place to decease. and reveals the fact that this had happened fifty old ages ago. To me. this is a narrative that captures all of the literary elements rather good.
and uses those elements to catch the reader’s attending.One component we are all familiar with is the usage of characters in a narrative. It is easy to state that 99 % of all narratives have some type of character in it.
The existent definition of the word is a individual stand foring a personality type. particularly by stressing typical traits. as linguistic communication. idiosyncrasies. physical make-up. and so forth. In The Cask of Amontillado.
we merely truly hold two chief characters: Fortunato and Montresor. Fortunato is described really good by Poe in the narrative. Thingss such as what he wears. how he talks. his love for intoxicant. and his relation to Montresor all come in to play in this. Similarly.
Montresor is all depicted good. He is cryptic. vindictive.
smart. craft. and evidently angry at Fortunato for some ground. All of these traits depicting the characters in some manner aid make a more graphic and descriptive narrative. For case. we learn that Fortunato has a job with imbibing. Knowing this.
Montresor leads the already rummy adult male down in to a catacomb to where he finally leaves him at that place to decease. Without the feature of loving vino and brandy that was given to Fortunato by Poe. there would hold been some incredulity to why he was dense plenty to follow Montresor in the first topographic point.In relation to characters. another chief literary component is the secret plan. A secret plan is a program. strategy. or the chief narrative of dramatic literally work within a novel or narrative.
Without a secret plan. there is no narrative to be told. It is the ground there is struggle in the narrative. and it keeps the readers involvement alive. In The Cask of Amontillado. the secret plan is basically Montresor desiring retaliation on Fortunato for something that had happened in their past together. The simple thought of person desiring retaliation led to the full narrative told by Poe.
and allowed other things such as characters. symbols and so forth to turn upon that thought. Not holding a secret plan doesn’t merely consequence a narrative. it wholly depletes it of holding any involvement.One other component that adds more to a narrative is the scene.
The puting consists of the clip. topographic point. physical inside informations. and the fortunes in which a state of affairs occurs. The scene is valuable to a narrative because it allows the reader to better see and understand how a narrative unfolds by associating certain physical inside informations to a piece of literature. Basically. it helps us make a image in our head.
and allows our imaginativeness to roll a spot. In the Cask for illustration. we are told that they go to an belowground graveyard.
This so absolutely fits the secret plan of the narrative in many ways. Not merely is what is traveling on cryptic. but there is besides decease environing the two characters in the narrative.
It merely so happens that at the terminal of it. Fortunato ends up dead. Basically.
in a narrative that is all about retaliation and decease. the scene is ironically in a topographic point surrounded by decease itself.In about every short narrative. novel. essay. and so forth. writers systematically use symbols in their pieces. A symbol is an point that represents something or holds greater intending than what would appears to the bare oculus.
They can run from a piece of vesture to a flower planted in the land. It all depends upon how the writer chooses to utilize it. I feel symbols are of import because it gives the narrative its ain personality.
and creates a deeper significance in most instances every bit good. An illustration from the narrative would be the vesture that Fortunato is have oning. At the start of the narrative we are told that he is have oning what appears to be the outfit of a buffoon or fool because of the festival they he is at.
This outfit symbolizes how much of an imbecile Montresor makes out of him in the narrative. He tricks the adult male have oning a dense outfit right in to his ain decease. and he didn’t see it coming at all. Small inside informations like this can add so much to a narrative.
and particularly so if more than one are present.Similar to the other elements. POV or point-of-view can greatly impact a narrative. There are four basic POV’s that are used invariably: First individual.
Third-person nonsubjective. Third-person limited. and Omniscient. First individual is the easiest in that the storyteller merely talks about things he or she sees. their ain personal ideas.
and can’t tell us the ideas of other characters. This is the POV used in The Cask of Amontillado. Third individual aim is an foreigner who can describe merely what he or she sees and hears.
The storyteller can state us what is go oning. but can’t tell us the ideas of characters. Wholly different from nonsubjective. Third individual limited is person who sees in to the heads of one of the characters. Last. Omniscient is person who is all knowing. and can come in the heads of all characters. This option gives the author the most freedom.
By reading the narrative in first individual. we have the best apprehension of how the character Montresor works. We know all of his secret ideas. his motivations. and so away.
Although we may non acquire to cognize all the inside informations of Fortunato because of this. we gain in the fact that the narrative is more powerful and cliff-hanging non cognizing what the other characters think. Overall. something every bit simple as position can alter 1s full point of view of something. and that is why it can be so critical to how narratives are written.The last literally element to be discussed is the intent. The intent of the narrative is somewhat different from the others in that it can non truly be seen in the narrative.
It is more so what one gathers or interprets from what the writer has written. In the most simplistic of definitions. it is the concluding behind why the writer. or in this instance Poe. decided to compose this piece. The intent can be tied to the author’s intended message that he or she is seeking to acquire to the readers.
In my ain personal sentiment. I believe that Poe intended to compose this narrative for pure amusement intents. In general. he wrote about things that were dark and decease related. So when it comes to this narrative. there is nil unusual about it. Possibly in his life.
he came across a individual that had done incorrect to him. and this was his imaginativeness coming on to paper. I think it’s a enigma merely he knows the reply to. The remainder of us are left to think what really drove him to compose it.
In relation to the intent of the narrative. I think that Poe tries to direct us the readers an overall message. In The Cask of Amontillado the message is be careful how you treat others. No uncertainty. the Golden Rule is one message. Treat others the manner you want to be treated. Montresor has taken abuse upon abuse from Fortunato.
He has suffered a 1000 hurts and has merely had plenty. Because of the manner he was treated. he now wants retaliation.
This is something that I picked up from reading the narrative. and I think is a message we can all pick up from it.The ground I chose this narrative is because out of all the others we have read.
this one was by far my favourite. It was reasonably exciting at the terminal. and it was one I didn’t mind reading from forepart to endorse. I like narratives that have to make with decease. and Poe is surely an expert at that.
Besides. the literally elements were really clear to me in this narrative compared to others. That doesn’t mean the other narratives had hapless usage of them. it merely means that I personally saw it better in this specific narrative. and in bend was able to compose a better paper because of it.The Cask of Amontillado is a great piece written by the writer Edgar Allen Poe.
It may non be his most celebrated work. but however. it’s still great. I think that he was able to capture each literary component to its full potency. and made it easy to happen within the reading. If I were to be asked out of all the narratives we have read this semester.
which one is the best. I would state this one in a pulse.Plants CitedDelaney. Bill. “Poe’s The Cask of Amontillado. ” ProQuest. N.
p. . Fall 2005. Web. 28 Mar. 2014. Graham.
Scott S. “Poe’s The Cask of Amontillado. ” ProQuest. N.
p. . Winter 2004. Web. 28 Mar. 2014. Trimmer.
Joseph F. The Sundance Introduction to Literature. Mason: Thomson Wadsworth. 2007. Print.