The Law and Race Discrimination

Discuss the nature of the jurisprudence and statute law and how it can alter behavior and attitude towards Race Discrimination against cultural minorities in the UK?

Glossary

1.1 Undertones for Immigration During the 1950’s and 1960’s …………….… 41.2 Legislation in the 1960’s ………………………………………………….

Best services for writing your paper according to Trustpilot

Premium Partner
From $18.00 per page
4,8 / 5
4,80
Writers Experience
4,80
Delivery
4,90
Support
4,70
Price
Recommended Service
From $13.90 per page
4,6 / 5
4,70
Writers Experience
4,70
Delivery
4,60
Support
4,60
Price
From $20.00 per page
4,5 / 5
4,80
Writers Experience
4,50
Delivery
4,40
Support
4,10
Price
* All Partners were chosen among 50+ writing services by our Customer Satisfaction Team

.…..

51.3 Racism in Britain ………………………………………………………… … … . 6Chapter 2Anti Discrimination Law and Legislation In Britain……… ..

. …… 72.1 Impact of Anti Discrimination Law and Legislation ………………………… . 82.2 Role of Law in Social Change and Social Life ……………………………….. 11Chapter 3 Where Britain Stands Today ……………………………………… 12Bibliography ……………………………………………….…………………… 18Laws and statute law are enacted to sets criterions for regulations of behaviour refering the citizens within the boundaries of a state to protect life, autonomy and belongings [ 1 ] in conformity with socially accepted norms that consider the rights of all of its public.

Bastiat ( 1850 ) maintains that every human being is bestowed a “ … natural right – from god …” [ 2 ] to these three rudimentss ( life, autonomy and belongings ) which brings the 4th component of jurisprudence into the apprehension, that they are an extension of the moral duty to move and believe within the community of human existences, which includes all of its participants. Unfortunately history provides infinite illustrations whereby the jurisprudence has been perverted to function the involvements of those in power to repress those without power, with illustrations of this maltreatment of the jurisprudence still in being today.Throughout history it has been shown that most Torahs which pervert the significance and the spirit of jurisprudence in its purest sense are those which involve some kind of favoritism. Laws that supported bondage in the Greek and Roman empires every bit good as those restricting the freedoms and autonomies of adult females dating back to ancient China point to the unfairnesss in the application of Torahs and statute law. In its purest sense ‘law’ , as defined by Bastiat ( 1850 ) , “…is the corporate organisation of the person to lawful defense.

” [ 3 ] The predating nevertheless does non convey into context its deeper intent which in Western civilisations is derived from the “Judeo-Christian Ethic” [ 4 ] which are the “…broad moral principles associated with the Judaic and Christian religions…” [ 5 ] that set Forth that the “…responsibility for one’s…” [ 6 ] actions begins with themselves. This of import moral deduction points to the spiritual intension of jurisprudence and its roots in righteous behaviour.Discrimination under civil rights jurisprudence is stated to be “…unfavorable or unjust treatment…” refering either persons or categories of persons based on their race, colour, sex, age, sexual orientation, faith or physical / mental disability. The United Kingdom Race Relations Act 1976 [ 7 ] was enacted to do such actions illegal every bit good as to convey to public attending the dissentious nature of racial favoritism. Moral behaviour, which this jurisprudence addresses, represents the comparative province of the development of a society in footings of its apprehension of the holiness of all human life and the ensuing equal rights which all members of that society are entitled to. Racism is in fact a modern phenomenon as the word did non look in the Oxford English Dictionary prior to 1910. [ 8 ] Isaac ( 2004 ) states that the present twenty-four hours term finds its beginnings in “scientific racism” [ 9 ] which was a consequence of evolutionary theories that developed in the 19th century. Isaac ( 2004 ) presents his instance that so there has existed throughout history varied signifiers of biass, but that they were based upon cultural and or cultural differences.

Racial favoritism finds its causes in forms of thought every bit good as cultural underpinnings as a erudite procedure stemming from the inclination of people to seek high quality and power.The geographical location and island nature of the British Isles has played a distinguishable function in how the United Kingdom developed every bit good as the influences upon its dwellers. Separated from Continental Europe by the English Channel, the British Isles were referred to as “Brit or Prit” [ 10 ] and were inhabited by the Bruthin or Priteni who were Celts that invaded the archipelago prior to the 5th century. [ 11 ] The geographical protection of H2O served to do the British Isles a hard chance refering invasion and conquering and is evidenced by the Romans in the 6Thursdaycentury, so the Norman Conquest in 1066 [ 12 ] . Since that clip England has been able to develop without the influence of foreign encroachers.

The preceding does non bespeak an isolationist policy as England was active in the Holy Crusades, the Napoleonic Wars, and colonisation in Africa, the South Seas and Australia every bit good as both World Wars. This stray internal development aided in the creative activity of a civilization of invention and independency for the United Kingdom which can be likened to Japan.

  1. Undertones for Immigration During the 1950’s and 1960’s

The terminal of World War II left the economic systems of Europe in shambles, in add-on to the loss of life which accompanied this struggle. A monolithic addition in in-migration in the United Kingdom occurred after World War II as a consequence of the state ask foring big Numberss of immigrants from Europe to make full occupations due to the enormous deficit of workers.

[ 13 ] Initially, there was an unofficial reluctance to hold these places filled by immigrants from Commonwealth states which was a consequence of British colonialism that started in 1750. And while the independency of a figure of states had been established, the common opinion linguistic communication and imposts that had existed as a consequence of the foregoing provided a natural synergism and enticement for immigrants from those states into the United Kingdom. The Commonwealth is the replacement to the former British Empire and the long history of cultural diverseness which marked the interaction of the authorities helped to fuel this inflow. One trademark event was the reaching of the ship Windrush on June 28, 1948 which landed with hundred of West Indian work forces on board. [ 14 ] The 1950’s and 60’s saw a important figure of immigrants besides from India every bit good as Pakistan whereby the colour difference subsequently became an issue..

[ 15 ]The immense figure of immigrants during the 1950’s created tensenesss that culminated in the Notting Hill Race Riots of 1958 that raged over five yearss. Reports have indicated that the public violences were attributable to a rabble of 400 citizens under the rallying call “Keep Britain White” [ 16 ] who reportedly went ‘hunting’ for West Indians who had settled in the vicinity. This rolling set were called “Teddy boys” [ 17 ] and brought to public attending what had been thought to be an issue which the state had evolved supra. The incident was non all one sided as West Indian young persons countered with onslaughts of their ain. The force escalated to the point where it involved 1000s. The constabulary records show that the public violences resulted in 108 persons being charged.

[ 18 ]

  1. Legislation in the 1960’s

The preceding are some of the events which saw statute law introduced that tightened in-migration Torahs throughout the 1950’s and 60’s: [ 19 ]

  1. Commonwealth Immigrants Act 1962

This Act set limitations on the figure of Commonwealth colonists by necessitating employment verifiers for admittance. While non straight a race ‘Act’ it was in response to the immense inflow of immigrants from the 1950’s.

  1. White Paper on Immigration from the Commonwealth 1965

This Act limited the issue of employment verifiers to 8,500 per twelvemonth and was directed chiefly to the professional and skilled trades.

  1. Race Relations Act 1965

This was Britain’s first race dealingss statute law and it outlawed favoritism in public topographic points. The Act besides established the Race Relations Board every bit good as the National Committee for Commonwealth Immigrants.

  1. Commonwealth Immigrant Act 1968

This Act broadened the commissariats of the anterior Act adding lodging and employment every bit good as presenting local councils for community dealingss.

The inclusion of in-migration statute law has been included as it efficaciously limited the inflow of lower income persons who tended to stand for minority groups of colour and therefore is important in understanding the pique of the state.

  1. Racism in Britain

Racism has been present in the United Kingdom every bit early as the nineteenth century in the signifier of anti Semitism every bit good as against immigrants who migrated from Eastern Europe. [ 20 ] In consequence this makes the United Kingdom fundamentally no different from any other state as signifiers of racism exist in every state. Its roots are that one race or races is inferior to another and this defines different intervention. It can and does take the signifier of colour, spiritual beliefs, civilization and harmonizing to some theories it represents a system of subjugation. [ 21 ] The withholding of certain rights, chances, privileges and related actions is endemic to this pattern.

Racism stems from beliefs and attitudes based in ignorance, deficiency of tolerance, instruction, attainment of political and or economic power every bit good as other principles which enable persons or groups to carry through predetermined terminals and or biass. Historical illustrations can be found in Hitler, bondage in ancient Rome every bit good as colonialism, America, Asia, Africa and South America. It by and large stems from stereotypes, fright, enviousness, societal conditioning, household and or community instructions, spiritual grounds, governmental policies and general struggle. Whatever its implicit in grounds it diminishes all of world by blowing clip, resources, attempts and parts.Even though in-migration policies stemmed the figure of new immigrants the net Numberss from the 1950’s through 1970’s established a base which grew significantly as a consequence of larger households within these groups.

The Race Relations Act 1976 was a comparatively weak piece of statute law as it did non grok the implicit in sentiments of favoritism. Unemployment and feelings of constabulary nonpartisanship combined with varied cases of offense disproportionately attributed to minorities construct up the thought that these groups ( chiefly inkinesss ) where non suited as British topics and out of measure with the system. [ 22 ] On the other side of the leger minorities felt they were excluded from take parting in the state as the Torahs and statute law did non supply for their autonomies and other commissariats. Economicss besides played an of import function during these periods as Britain did non recover its fiscal stature after the war with occupations for males falling by over 2 million during a 10 twelvemonth period, and female employment as a consequence of service industry occupations really rose.

The diminution of trade and traditional occupations for males had excessively many work forces available for a smaller industrial base assisting to fuel racialist sentiments as there was non adequate employment.Chapter 2 –Anti Discrimination Law and Legislation In BritainThe transition of race favoritism Torahs and statute law in the United Kingdom represent authorities intercession in the public sphere to impact thought, actions, behaviour and pattern refering the right to equality by all of its citizens. Bastiat ( 1850 ) explains that the jurisprudence is “… the corporate right of the single right to lawful defense.” [ 23 ] He amplifies this account by saying that since each person has the natural right bestowed by God to support his individual, autonomy and belongings. Subsequently a group of work forces besides have this right, which explains the usage of the word ‘collective’ . When groups of persons through understanding enact corporate rights they can therefore make Torahs and statute law to do these apprehensions adhering upon all members of their society. In a perfect universe, all of society’s members would understand and stay by regulations of behaviour and behavior which were in consideration of other members of that society.

However, this is non the instance with people every bit good as some authoritiess, which are establishments run by persons. The mistake lies in biass, attitudes, conditioning and deficiency of understanding that the community of human existences encompasses and requires that we see and treat others the manner that we would wish to be treated.The manner in which people behave is a map of the varied mental places they take or make on a topic or topics based upon their upbringing, external influences and stimulations, societal force per unit areas, instruction and misconceptions. The predating forms an individual’s attitude ( s ) [ 24 ] . The jurisprudence and statute law can hold an affect in altering people’s behaviour as a consequence of punishments associated with disobedience, nevertheless this does non needfully intend that their attitudes have been adjusted. Persons who are incarcerated provide an illustration of the foregoing.

They are obligated to follow regulations of behaviour and behavior as a consequence of the punishments that can be enacted, but the high rates of recidivism clearly show that one time the environment is removed they revert back to prior forms of action. The preceding is because they have non changed the attitudes that resulted in detrimental behavioural forms.The foregoing does non intend that the Torahs and statute law that have been enacted have non changed the behaviour and attitudes of a bulk of persons within the United Kingdom with regard to racial favoritism. The passage of statute law and Torahs serve to convey issues into the head of public consciousness and through this exposure it helps to consequence a alteration in mentality every bit good as behaviour and attitudes. However, the jurisprudence every bit good as statute law in and of itself is non plenty. Programs implying instruction, media exposure and community/work interactions and treatments can assist to take misconceptions and biass. The Notting Hill Carnival which has been effectual in advancing integrity in that country after the black public violences of 1958 is an illustration of how interaction between the races can take to the riddance of misconceptions and reenforce the cloth of a community.

2.1 Impact of Anti Discrimination Law and LegislationThe biass and misconceptions refering racial issues in the United Kingdom represent decennaries of sentiments and attitudes which can non be merely legislated out of being. The predating nevertheless does non intend that by and big the bulk of Britons needed Torahs to do them to move or believe constructively refering racial affairs. However, statute law does do those in the minority to experience that their issues, concerns and topographic point in British society have significance and good as cogency. The followers is a chronological history of events in the United Kingdom on how the issue of racial dealingss has developed since the transition of the Race Relations Act 1965: [ 25 ]

  1. Race Relations Act 1965

This Act made it illegal to know apart in any public location where the populace at big congregates in response to the pattern at some venues of excluding people of colour entree.

  1. 1968 Commonwealth Immigration Act

As a consequence of inhibitory Torahs in Kenya against Kenyan Asians doing it either hard or impossible to do a life, about 100,000 immigrated to the United Kingdom.

  1. Race Relations Act 1968

As conformity with the 1965 Act was deemed to be less than anticipated, commissariats of the Act were strengthened.

  1. 1969 Sikh Allowed to Wear Turban at Work

Sohan Singh Jolly won the right to have on his turban while executing his occupation as a bus driver and the prohibition was lifted for all others as good. His action was underscored by the Transport and General Workers Union which provided support outside of the Sikh community.

  1. 1971 Commonwealth Migrant Entry Restricted

This statute law enacted that migratory workers must possess a work license in order to stay in the state with lasting residence granted after they have been employed systematically for five old ages. This statute law was enacted to stem the flow of immigrants that resulted from the 1950’s and 60’s which was prompted by the labour deficit.

  1. Race Relations Act 1976

The events of the MacPherson Report after the decease of Stephen Lawrence resulted in the Act being strengthened.

  1. 1978 Nightclub Required to Remove Race Ban

The Commission for Racial Equality ordered a Birmingham cabaret to supply service to black and Chinese frequenters in the first instance exerting its powers.

  1. 1979 Teacher Death Occurs in Southall Riots

Thousands of demonstrators against an utmost rightist organisation resulted in one human death who was reportedly struck by a constabulary nightstick.

  1. 1981 Brixton Riot

A public violence broke out after the apprehension of a black adult male that resulted in hurt to 150 constabulary officers every bit good as 350 citizens and 20 apprehensions.

  1. 1985 Brixton Riots

The inadvertent shot of a black adult female by constabulary sparked rioting in this community for the 2nd clip in five old ages as a consequence.

  1. Race Relations Act 2000

The Act was further strengthened to include the constabulary and besides requires that public entities promote equality in their policies.The passage of race jurisprudence and statute law has non divided the United Kingdom into cantonments, nor has it quelled the racial issue. The positive facets are that:

  1. Laws and statute law are in topographic point refering favoritism.

  2. The assorted ‘Acts’ informed the populace that favoritism is non tolerated.
  3. Minority groups in the United Kingdom have Torahs and statute law which have been enacted to guarantee and protect their rights to equality.

Similarly the passage of the indicated Torahs and statute law have besides brought to light assorted negative facets every bit good:

  1. Varied groups advancing negative racial issues, such as the utmost National Front, have become more ocular and pronounced in their places.
  2. The constabulary have been chided for their prejudice on race relation issues.
  3. Overt racial favoritism Acts of the Apostless have given manner to more and elusive less discernible signifiers.

The preceding is inconclusive in footings of the affects of Torahs and statute law aimed at advancing equality in the United Kingdom2.2 Role of Law in Social Change and Social LifeThe passage of assorted Torahs and statute law definitively advises the populace of the place of society on certain issues which are a contemplation of the public’s manner and sentiment.

The jurisprudence is an instrument in societal alteration merely after the issue at manus has become outstanding plenty to do the passage of statute law on its behalf. The societal issues which result in the preceding must be demonstrative in footings of the glowering demand to do such statute law or have considerable failing in Acts or Torahs antecedently enacted that require accommodation and or alteration. Laws and statute law reflect issues and or failings which are good known to the populace at big and reflect the bulk sentiment that the issues need rectification through the legal system that imposes punishments for inappropriate action ( s ) which are contrary to the public good. [ 26 ]Laws and statute law protect and back up the activities, purposes and impressions of good in society, in their purest sense, and enforce punishments for those who act against this social apprehension. The use of legal agencies has been argued as the most hard every bit good as the slowest via which to impact and accomplish societal alteration if it does non reflect the societal consensus. [ 27 ] The preceding is true because government’s intent is to reflect the will of the people instead than to attest its ain will when the public consensus does non reflect it.Chapter 3 – Where Britain Stands TodayThe concluding barometer of where the public stands with respect to their sentiments on the effectivity of anti favoritism Torahs and statute law remainders with them.

A study conducted by BBC Online concludes that 50 % of the respondents “… believe the authorities has failed to make enough…” [ 28 ] to efficaciously battle racism in the United Kingdom. The preceding is fundamentally a hapless accounting of the advancement made from the 1960’s in footings of the accomplishment of equality every bit good as the net effects of statute law to advance same. The study uncovered that over 50 % of the respondents indicated that they think “…they live in a racialist society.” [ 29 ] And the preceding findings where borne out by minorities where over 50 % of those surveyed who are black and 47 % of the Asians indicated that they think “…there is grounds of discrimination.” [ 30 ] This same position persists with respect to conditions in employment where 33 % of black and Asiatic respondents believe that there are racial jobs suppressing equality.

The distressing facet is that this same study found that 44 % of all respondents stated they thought that “… immigration…” had damaged the quality of Britain during the past 50 old ages. [ 31 ]The canvass was discussed with Gurbux Singh, who was at that clip the Chairman for Racial Equality, stated that while Britain is a multi racial state “…we think that racism is on the increase.” [ 32 ] Mr. Singh did travel on to add that the study besides indicated that it did give some positive indicants such as that 53 % said that they did hold friends with differing racial backgrounds.

In all, the study indicates that race dealingss have progressed small since the 1960’s, the following study countries provide the principle for this position: [ 33 ]

  1. Immigration

The inquiries posed were as follows:

  1. Make Britishers welcome immigrants?

Entire White Black AsiaticYes48 % 47 % 49 % 49 %No44 % 46 % 38 % 37 %Don’t Know9 % 7 % 13 % 14 %

  1. Do immigrants do a positive part to the state?

Entire White Black AsiaticYes26 % 23 % 49 % 55 %No54 % 59 % 29 % 25 %Don’tKnow20 % 18 % 22 % 20 %

  1. Do immigrant communities encounter troubles incorporating into British society?

Entire White Black AsiaticEasy20 % 19 % 20 % 23 %Difficult61 % 63 % 59 % 59 %Don’tKnow19 % 18 % 20 % 19 %

  1. Justice

A sampling of the inquiries posed on Justice were as follows:

  1. Make the tribunals, attorneies and Judgess treat minorities every bit?

Entire White Black AsiaticReasonably58 % 60 % 43 % 50 %Unfairly18 % 16 % 29 % 26 %Don’tKnow25 % 24 % 27 % 24 %

  1. Do you believe you would have a just test in tribunal?

Entire White Black AsiaticYes77 % 79 % 53 % 61 %No11 % 10 % 20 % 18 %Don’tKnow12 % 11 % 27 % 22 %

  1. Polices

The followers are selected responses to inquiries refering the constabulary

  1. Make the constabulary discriminate on racial evidences?

Entire White Black AsiaticYes37 % 34 % 55 % 47 %No45 % 47 % 31 % 36 %Don’tKnow19 % 19 % 14 % 16 %

  1. Did the slaying of Stephen Lawrence aid to relieve racial tensenesss with the constabulary?

Entire White Black AsiaticYes38 % 39 % 39 % 36 %No37 % 36 % 38 % 36 %Don’tKnow25 % 25 % 24 % 29 %

  1. Politicss

A sampling of political inquiries from the study follow:

  1. Has the present Labour disposal been effectual in covering with racial jobs?

Entire White Black AsiaticYes28 % 29 % 30 % 33 %No50 % 50 % 47 % 44 %Don’tKnow22 % 21 % 24 % 23 %

  1. Should at that place be more colored representation in Parliament?

Entire White Black AsiaticYes38 % 26 % 53 % 62 %No39 % 42 % 20 % 16 %Don’tKnow23 % 23 % 27 % 22 %

  1. Social Attitudes and Relationships
    1. Do you believe that Britain is racially oriented?

Entire White Black AsiaticYes51 % 52 % 53 % 41 %No40 % 41 % 37 % 45 %Don’tKnow9 % 8 % 10 % 14 %

  1. Have you been a victim of racial maltreatment?

Entire White Black AsiaticYes20 % 22 % 15 % 14 %No74 % 72 % 79 % 78 %Don’tKnow6 % 7 % 6 % 8 %

  1. Are any of your friends from differing cultural backgrounds?

Entire White Black AsiaticYes53 % 49 % 87 % 82 %No46 % 50 % 11 % 16 %Don’tKnow1 % 1 % 1 % 2 %The predating study trying provides the informations necessary to find that the comparative advancement in racial dealingss has proceeded really easy in footings of integrating and credence.The BBC Online Survey has clearly revealed that the advancement of racial favoritism in the United Kingdom since the 1960’s has been highly fringy in footings of altering the attitudes of the general population every bit good as advancement on equality evidences. The study consequences strongly indicate that the present statute law is non carry throughing the undertaking. The preceding has non gone unnoticed by assorted beginnings and the Centre for Public Law along with the Judge Institute of Management Studies has examined bing Torahs and statute law and proposed possible redresss to better the model.

The undermentioned summarizes those findings: [ 34 ]

  1. Outdated statute law has excessively many disconnected facets every bit good as incompatibilities between the assorted bureaus that inhibits effectual inadvertence of bing Torahs every bit good as their enforcement. This complexness and non-uniformity has watered down the efficiency of the Torahs and statute law.
  2. The Report indicates that the bing statute law be improved to be more accessible and easy understood.
  3. Existing statute law is non strong plenty in its punishments every bit good as enforcement.
  4. Government force per unit areas have non accomplished their aims in footings of doing higher degrees of conformity and advancement.

  5. Updating the context of statute law in maintaining with EU jurisprudence.
  6. Revision of both the political and legal constructions to reflect a civilization more in maintaining with proactive rights enforcement and publicity.

The joint survey stated that the current model is authorities dependent and does non set up an effectual system for mensurating coordination every bit good as conformity in add-on to its cumbersome matrix. The bureaucratic nature of the bing model does non realize the procedure therefore the Torahs and statute law are rendered fundamentally uneffective. The present system does non imply the use of a pro-active attack utilizing forces to make out to the populace.

The current system delaies for the populace to make out to them and therefore those countries and facets where instruction, information and cases of maltreatment are present are non identified and therefore corrected. The statute law and model is inactive and the complexness of the statute law does more to deter persons from utilizing it than it does to promote them.The most permeant job is that the statute law has been drafted in such a mode that it resembles the system for civil jurisprudence instead than societal. The difference is similar to the anti drug, AIDSs and abortion jobs society has faced and managed to derive some kind of bridgehead on as a consequence of a planned public dealingss plan that activates the procedure. The proposed redresss have been identified as:

  1. Establish consistent and clear criterions.
  2. Better the efficiency and effectivity of the regulative model.
  3. Develop answerability criterions whereby mensurable advancement can be determined.

  4. Open the procedure to minorities to assist determine the system to be more antiphonal and effectual.
  5. Provide for an effectual damages system to do the statute law to hold punitory effects.

The gap of the procedure to include more public interaction every bit good as acquaintance will realize it and therefore do it evident that favoritism is now longer a inactive issue, it is active.

Bibliography

aces.org.legal.com.

2005.Rules for Law Reform and Social Change. hypertext transfer protocol: //www.childsupport-aces.org/legal-social.htmlAmbedkar, Babasaheb. 2005.

Law. hypertext transfer protocol: //www.bamuniversity.org/dept/law.

htmBastiat, Frederic, 1850.The Law. hypertext transfer protocol: //bastiat.orgBBB.com. 2005.

Discrimination Surveies. hypertext transfer protocol: //news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/2000063.stmbbc.co.uk.

2005.Race and Discrimination Articles. hypertext transfer protocol: //news.

bbc.co.uk/onthisday/hi/dates/stories/november/26/newsid_3220000/3220635.stmBritannica Online. 2005.Peoples, Demographic Trends, Migration Patterns. hypertext transfer protocol: //www.

britannica.com/eb/article? tocId=44688Centre for Public Law along with the Judge Institute of Management Studies. 2005.Independent Review of the Enforcement of Anti-Discrimination Legislation.hypertext transfer protocol: //ccpr.law.

cam.ac.uk/antidisc.htmlHome Office. 2005.Race Relations Act 1976. hypertext transfer protocol: //www.

homeoffice.gov.uk/docs/part1.htmlIsaac, Benjamin. 2004.The Invention of Racism in Classical Antiquity. P 23 – 38. Princeton University Press.

ISBN: 0691116911LeTouze, Dominique, Watters, Charles. 2000.Good Practice in Mental Health and Social Care for Refugees and Asylum Seekers. European Commission and European Refugee FundRace for racial justness. 2005.

Immigration Legislation. hypertext transfer protocol: //www.r4rj.org.uk/IMMIGRATIONLEGISLATION.htmSeanBryson.com.

2005.After 44 Old ages! Secret documents reveal the truth about five darks of force in Notting Hill. hypertext transfer protocol: //www.carnival2.bravehost.com/notting_hill_race_riots.htmlsociologyindex.

.com. 2005.

Judeo-christian Ethic. hypertext transfer protocol: //www.sociologyindex.

com/judeo.htmwikimirror.com. 2005.

British Isles. hypertext transfer protocol: //www.wikimirror.com/British_IslesWikipedia.com. 2005.Racism.

hypertext transfer protocol: //en.wikipedia.org/wiki/RacismYassine, Abdel-Qadar. 2005.Causes of Racism in Britain. hypertext transfer protocol: //www.

immi.se/ir/ir2001/yassine.htmZanna, Mark 1990.Progresss in Experimental Social Psychology. Vol.

23, P 75-109. Academic Press. ISBN: 01201522311