The IR theory that best describes the MiddleEast is constructivism-this theory places an emphasis on norms and values toexplain how the interests of states are born and why states select a specificaction over another. Constructivists claim that all actors discover how toprioritize themselves and think about what they value most through theirinteractions with one another. Constructivism contains the notion that normsand rules may influence a states’ interests.
By observing the interactionsbetween leaders in the Middle East, one can understand the important events,which have taken, place in this region. The constructivist lense explains theunstable region of the Middle East better than any other IR theory. Although theories of internationalrelations claim to explain the way global politics works, some are inferiortowards others, while others, in this case constructivism, are superior. Aliberalism approach would least describe modern Middle East because it centersaround the values of individual liberty and equality, which is from accurate tothe values in that region today.